Is there such thing as one bit of information?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fractalzen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Information
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of a bit as the smallest unit of information, questioning whether one bit requires additional dimensions for location, thus potentially representing more than just a single bit. It argues that a bit can exist independently of its spatial context, as demonstrated by computer memory where 8 bits form a byte without needing to specify location. The conversation also introduces the tally system, which operates on a base that allows for fewer states than binary, highlighting its convenience due to human anatomy. However, the tally system lacks positional context, which can limit its efficiency compared to binary representation. Ultimately, the debate centers on the relationship between information representation and dimensionality.
fractalzen
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The smallest unit of information is a bit, which has two possible states. Yet don't you also have to specify the location of this information? So in a 4d world we're talking about 4 + 1 = 5 degrees of freedom, or 5 bits of information to code for just the one bit.

So is there really such thing as one bit of information or is each bit of information really 5 bits?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fractalzen said:
Yet don't you also have to specify the location of this information?
No. You can say "this device [here] stores one bit of information". And this information (not your description of it!) can then be zero or one.
 
Why should it be necessary for a bit of information to be described in a 4d world space?
Depending on what the bit represents it could be in any dimensional world space.
8 bits in a computer memory describe what is called a 'byte', which represents a value in a linear (one dimensional) world space.
We don't need to know where the computer is located in space and time for the information to be meaningful.
 
Isn't this base 5 though rather than base 1?
Here, each 'cell' of information, (or whatever it's called) has five possible states instead of two, so obviously less such cells can indicate a given value.
Take the number 27 for example though, that's just a number out of thin air.
It can be described in binary as 11011, five information cells.
In the tally system it is 5+5+5+5+5+2, 6 information cells to describe the same number.
 
The groups of 5 are just made to make it more convenient to read. Every tick has the same value of 1, independent of its position.
 
Wut mfb said. :wink:
 
It certainly is convenient given that we have five fingers.
 
rootone said:
It certainly is convenient given that we have five fingers.
Well, thing is, as soon as you introduce fingers, you also introduce position. You can count up to 31 on a single hand if you use binary, because each finger has a unique position and therefore can be ascribed a unique meaning.

In the tally system, there are no columns/positions. If there are five marks, then it indicates five, regardless of mark position, proximity or spacing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
12K