B Is this a new theorem?

AI Thread Summary
The expression a-1 x a+1 = a squared - 1 is a well-established mathematical identity known as the difference of squares. This formula is fundamental in algebra and has been recognized for thousands of years, with its origins tracing back to ancient civilizations. The discussion highlights that while the inquiry is valid, the concept is not new, and the individual is significantly late in discovering it. Additionally, it is noted that this identity holds true in Abelian rings but may not apply in other mathematical structures like matrices. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of foundational mathematical principles.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
a-1 x a+1= a squared-1 Is this an established theorem or have I stumbled onto something that might get my name in the math books?
 
  • Haha
Likes PeroK and berkeman
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zuz said:
a-1 x a+1= a squared-1 Is this an established theorem or have I stumbled onto something that might get my name in the math books?
No.
 
pinball1970 said:
No.
To which question? Or to both? :wink:
 
zuz said:
a-1 x a+1= a squared-1 Is this an established theorem or have I stumbled onto something that might get my name in the math books?
Google difference of squares
 
berkeman said:
To which question? Or to both? :wink:
Yes
 
  • Haha
Likes berkeman, SammyS and fresh_42
zuz said:
a-1 x a+1= a squared-1 Is this an established theorem or have I stumbled onto something that might get my name in the math books?
Well-established is correct. It is one of the most important basic formulas that is used in many places. Whenever you see one of the terms ##a+1\, , \,a-1\, , \,a^2-1## or similar ##a+b\, , \,a-b\, , \,a^2-b^2## then you should think about it. I would estimate that you are roundabout 5,000 years late for the textbooks.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
zuz said:
a-1 x a+1= a squared-1 Is this an established theorem or have I stumbled onto something that might get my name in the math books?
Ok. High school education and you have been messing about with multiplying brackets?
Just for fun?
Good on you. I STILL do not know what mathematics actually is, I have no idea.
So I was not mocking you in any way.
If you are investigating? Good on you.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and SammyS
A caveat: The result holds only in Abelian rings. If, e.g., A,B are matrices , result won't hold. Try expanding ##(A+B)(A-B)##, to see why, where the assumption is used.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory and PeroK
fresh_42 said:
Well-established is correct. It is one of the most important basic formulas that is used in many places. Whenever you see one of the terms ##a+1\, , \,a-1\, , \,a^2-1## or similar ##a+b\, , \,a-b\, , \,a^2-b^2## then you should think about it. I would estimate that you are roundabout 5,000 years late for the textbooks.
Thank you for a reply that is straight forward. But I think 5000 years is stretching it.
 
  • #10
zuz said:
Thank you for a reply that is straight forward. But I think 5000 years is stretching it.
Maybe a little bit. The Babylonians knew Pythagoras' theorem about 3,800 years ago.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
72
Views
7K
2
Replies
95
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top