Delzac
- 389
- 0
But anyway, if a student were to really write such interesting answer, will he be awarded full credit?
The discussion revolves around the authenticity of a story involving a barometer and its use to determine the height of a tall building. Participants explore whether the scenario described in a purported message from a physics professor is a hoax or a well-known physics joke. The conversation touches on the historical context of the joke, its variations, and the ethical implications of presenting it as a factual event.
Participants generally agree that the story is likely a joke or a hoax, but there is no consensus on its origins or whether it was based on a real event. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the story and its ethical presentation.
Participants note that the story's attribution and the context in which it is presented may lead to misunderstandings among readers who are not familiar with the physics community or the joke itself.
The author of the article doesn't claim to be a physics professor, but rather he appears to identify himself as "A Washington-based Economist". The entire column is in quotations and it is presented as "A message from a Physics Prof". The author may have actually received this from a "Physics Prof", or he may have some other good faith basis to believe that this is a message from a person of this description. I would ask for a clarification of exactly what the author is claiming before making an accusation that he could easily explain away in any number of ways.ZapperZ said:This is supposedly a "message" from a physics professor...I believe that this is a hoax and something someone made up...My conclusion: whoever wrote the article made up this story and that this scenario never happened. I'm waiting for enough people to read this as witnesses before I write an e-mail to whoever runs this thing.