Is This Barometer Height Question a Hoax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a purported message from a physics professor regarding a barometer's use to measure the height of a building, which many participants believe to be a hoax. They reference Martin Gardner's earlier work, where similar questions and humorous answers about the barometer were presented, suggesting that the article may have misrepresented the original context. The conversation highlights various creative and humorous methods to determine a building's height using a barometer, reinforcing that these ideas are well-known jokes within the physics community. Participants express concern over the ethical implications of presenting the story as factual without proper attribution, emphasizing that the article's presentation could mislead readers unfamiliar with the joke. Overall, the thread critiques the lack of transparency in the article's claims and discusses the broader implications of misrepresenting humorous anecdotes as real events.
  • #31
But anyway, if a student were to really write such interesting answer, will he be awarded full credit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes, but the marks will be hidden and he'll be required to discern their location using a bowling ball and an eyedropper.
 
  • #33
ZapperZ said:
This is supposedly a "message" from a physics professor...I believe that this is a hoax and something someone made up...My conclusion: whoever wrote the article made up this story and that this scenario never happened. I'm waiting for enough people to read this as witnesses before I write an e-mail to whoever runs this thing.
The author of the article doesn't claim to be a physics professor, but rather he appears to identify himself as "A Washington-based Economist". The entire column is in quotations and it is presented as "A message from a Physics Prof". The author may have actually received this from a "Physics Prof", or he may have some other good faith basis to believe that this is a message from a person of this description. I would ask for a clarification of exactly what the author is claiming before making an accusation that he could easily explain away in any number of ways.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K