Is This Inequality Solvable for Positive Variables?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evagelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the solvability of a specific inequality involving positive variables: x/(y+z) + y/(z+x) + z/(x+y) ≥ 3/2. Participants explore various methods and transformations to approach the problem, including algebraic manipulation and the application of known inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help with the inequality and specifies that x, y, z are positive variables.
  • Another participant mentions knowing eight proofs for the inequality and suggests rewriting the left-hand side for similarity, indicating that algebraic manipulation is crucial.
  • A different participant expresses difficulty in finding a proof and inquires about resources for solving challenging inequalities.
  • Further hints are provided about making numerators similar and using known inequalities like AM-GM and Cauchy-Schwarz.
  • One participant proposes proving a related inequality using the relationship between harmonic and arithmetic means.
  • Another participant presents an equivalent inequality derived from the original and asks how to proceed from there.
  • Discussion includes attempts to factor expressions and explore different approaches to reach a solution.
  • Participants suggest using the rearrangement inequality and consider sequences of numbers to aid in the proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and approaches to tackle the inequality, but there is no consensus on a single solution or method. Multiple competing views and techniques remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference several known inequalities and techniques, but the discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions necessary to reach a definitive conclusion.

evagelos
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
can some body help me with the following inequality.



...x/(y+z) +y/(z+x) + z/(x+y)>=3/2......

...for x>0,y>0,z>0.........
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Hmm I know about 8 proofs for this inequality. The simplest ones still require a transformation. Without giving away too much, can you rewrite the left-hand side so that each term looks more "similar"? Anyways the algebraic manipulation is the key. Once you've made it you can pretty much apply the mean chain of inequalities (AM-GM is the most common one), normalize the inequality, or various other methods.
 


8 ? I can't even make one.
please show me all.is there a book for impossible inequalities having a general plan for
solving them??
please inform me
 


Ok maybe the last hint wasn't enough. On the left hand side, can you make each term's numerator the same? It shouldn't be hard to determine what that expression for the numerators should be if you consider what the denominators look like (y+z, z+x, x+y).

Anyways, this inequality is meant to demonstrate various methods of solving even harder inequalities. You won't learn anything if I showed you the proofs and you don't know some basics about inequalities to begin with. Good inequality material usually stems from good problem solving books such as Problem Solving Strategies by Arthur Engel. But the least you should know is the Arithmetic Mean - Geometric Mean inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Then there are probably about a dozen more well-known and relatively elementary inequalities. After that it's just using those inequalities and algebraic manipulation.
 
Last edited:


man i know the stuff ,H<=G<=A,CSI and the rest but inequalities are always a puzzle to
me.
Thanks for the tip so we must prove that :

(x+y+z){ 1/(x+y) + 1/(x+z) + 1/(z+y)}>=9/2 using H<=A
Now is there any other way apart from this one ??
i tell you what ,i will post another difficult inequality ,so please look at the new post
and help me
 


Well could you prove it using AM-HM? You're very close. Can you make the two products on the left hand side look more similar? Multiply both sides by 2 and then rewrite the (x+y+z) term to match the reciprocals then it immediately follows from AM-HM.
 


.thanks iknow how to do it now but please go to another thread for inequalities again
and please if you can help me with the new one .i posted just now under general maths again



.
 


suppose somebody cannot find the trick to add 3 to both sides of the inequality and then transform it into the proper shape so to use Hm--Am,and instead of that does all the
calculations and cancellations and ends up with the following equivalent inequality:

2x^3 + 2y^3 + 2z^3 >= yx^2 + xy^2 + zx^2 + xz^2 + zy^2 + yz^2.


how can we proceed from here to solve the inequality??
 


[tex](x-y)^2(x+y) \geq 0[/tex]
 
  • #10


.........very good............
now,where did you get the idea to transform :

...x^3 + y^3 - yx^2 -xy^2 into (x +y)(x-y)^2?
 
  • #11


Well the first thing I tried was [tex](x^2 + y^2)(x+y)[/tex]. I had the [tex]x^2[/tex] and the [tex]x[/tex] parts already since I needed an [tex]x^3[/tex] term. Obviously this was not correct since it resulted in [tex]x^3 + x^2y + xy^2 + y^3[/tex]. I needed the two middle terms to be negative to prove the inequality. Hence looking back again I realized if I changed the signs in the products to negatives, the "first" and "last" resulting terms would be positive while the "middle" two would be negative.
 
  • #12
  • #13


snipez90 either you are a magician or you hiding something.

Thanks anyway for your help to put my mind in the correct path of the puzzle
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K