MHB Is this proof of x² - y² = 270 being unsolvable valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SweatingBear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Review
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the equation x² - y² = 270 has no positive integer solutions. The proof examines various cases based on the parity of x and y, concluding that in each case, the resulting equations lead to contradictions regarding the integrality of k and p. A key point is that since 270 is a multiple of 2 but not of 4, the factors x+y and x-y cannot have the same parity, preventing their product from equaling 270. An alternative proof highlights that the remainders of square integers modulo 4 cannot yield a remainder of 2, further confirming the impossibility of solutions. The overall consensus is that the original proof and the alternative methods are valid.
SweatingBear
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Forum, I would love if you had a look at my proof below and gave me some feedback. Is the approach valid? Perhaps you have an alternative way to solve the problem? Anything helps!

Problem: Prove that there exist no positive integers $$x$$ and $$y$$ such that $$x^2 -y^2 = 270$$.

Proof: Given that $$x, y \in \mathbb{N}$$ where $$\mathbb{N} = \{ 1, 2, 3, \ldots \}$$, we can infer that $$x$$ and $$y$$ respectively will be either even or odd. That means we have four different cases to examine.

Case #1: $$x$$ even, $$y$$ even. Let $$x = 2k $$ and $$y = 2p$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$(2k)^2 - (2p)^2 = 270 \iff 4k^2 - 4p^2 = 270 \iff k^2 - p^2 = \frac {270}4 \, .$$

Note now that $$k^2 - p^2$$ itself is in an integer but $$\frac {270}4$$ is not, which clearly is nonsensical. $$k$$ and $$p$$ can therefore not be integers and consequently neither $$x$$ and $$y$$ (at least not even integers).

Case #2: $$x$$ even, $$y$$ odd. Let $$x = 2k $$ and $$y = 2p-1$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$(2k)^2 - (2p-1)^2 = 270 \iff 4(k^2 - p^2 + p) - 1 = 270 \iff k^2 - p^2 + p = \frac {271}4 \, .$$

Similarly, $$k^2 - p^2 + p$$ is integral but $$\frac {271}4$$ is not; nonsensical of course and thus $$k$$ and $$p$$ cannot be integral (and consequently neither $$x$$ and $$y$$).

Note: the case $$x$$ odd and $$y$$ even is analogous and will therefore be skipped.

Case #3: $$x$$ odd, $$y$$ odd. Let $$x = 2k - 1 $$ and $$y = 2p-1$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$4(k^2 - k - p^2 + p) = 270 \iff k^2 - k - p^2 + p = \frac {270}4 \, .$$

Again, this leads us to the conclusion that $$k$$ and $$p$$ cannot be integers and therefore neither $$x$$ and $$y$$. $$\text{Q.E.D.}$$

Any thoughts?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That argument looks fine. The key to it is the fact that 270 is a multiple of 2 but not a multiple of 4. In fact, if $x^2-y^2 = (x+y)(x-y) = 270$ then one of the factors $x+y$, $x-y$ must be even and the other one odd. But $x+y = (x-y) + 2y$, so $x+y$ and $x-y$ have the same parity (either both even or both odd), so their product cannot be 270.
 
sweatingbear said:
Forum, I would love if you had a look at my proof below and gave me some feedback. Is the approach valid? Perhaps you have an alternative way to solve the problem? Anything helps!

Problem: Prove that there exist no positive integers $$x$$ and $$y$$ such that $$x^2 -y^2 = 270$$.

Proof: Given that $$x, y \in \mathbb{N}$$ where $$\mathbb{N} = \{ 1, 2, 3, \ldots \}$$, we can infer that $$x$$ and $$y$$ respectively will be either even or odd. That means we have four different cases to examine.

Case #1: $$x$$ even, $$y$$ even. Let $$x = 2k $$ and $$y = 2p$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$(2k)^2 - (2p)^2 = 270 \iff 4k^2 - 4p^2 = 270 \iff k^2 - p^2 = \frac {270}4 \, .$$

Note now that $$k^2 - p^2$$ itself is in an integer but $$\frac {270}4$$ is not, which clearly is nonsensical. $$k$$ and $$p$$ can therefore not be integers and consequently neither $$x$$ and $$y$$ (at least not even integers).

Case #2: $$x$$ even, $$y$$ odd. Let $$x = 2k $$ and $$y = 2p-1$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$(2k)^2 - (2p-1)^2 = 270 \iff 4(k^2 - p^2 + p) - 1 = 270 \iff k^2 - p^2 + p = \frac {271}4 \, .$$

Similarly, $$k^2 - p^2 + p$$ is integral but $$\frac {271}4$$ is not; nonsensical of course and thus $$k$$ and $$p$$ cannot be integral (and consequently neither $$x$$ and $$y$$).

Note: the case $$x$$ odd and $$y$$ even is analogous and will therefore be skipped.

Case #3: $$x$$ odd, $$y$$ odd. Let $$x = 2k - 1 $$ and $$y = 2p-1$$ ($$k,p\in\mathbb{N}$$); this yields

$$4(k^2 - k - p^2 + p) = 270 \iff k^2 - k - p^2 + p = \frac {270}4 \, .$$

Again, this leads us to the conclusion that $$k$$ and $$p$$ cannot be integers and therefore neither $$x$$ and $$y$$. $$\text{Q.E.D.}$$

Any thoughts?

it looks good

a shorter proof shall be

x^2 - y^2 = (x-y)(x+y) = (x- y)(x- y+ 2y)

either both are odd or even so product is odd or multiple of 4 if even,
270 is multiple of 2 and not 4 and hence not possible

I am sorry. I had not seen Oplag's proof which is almost same.
 
Fantastic, thank you!
 
Hi everyone, :)

Another method to prove this is to use the fact that every square integer when divided by \(4\) gives a remainder of \(0\) or \(1\). That is, \(x^2\equiv n\mbox{(mod 4)}\) has solutions if and only if \(n\equiv 0,\,1\mbox{(mod 4)}\). Hence the remainder of \(x^2-y^2\) divided by \(4\) should be either \(0,\, 1\) or \(3\). But the remainder of \(270\) divided by \(4\) is \(2\). Hence we arrive at the conclusion that \(x^2-y^2=270\) has no integer solutions.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top