Is this solution for interstellar travel viable?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the viability of faster-than-light (FTL) travel using concepts from quantum physics, specifically the Casimir effect and negative mass. The papers referenced, including "Weighing the vacuum with the Archimedes experiment" and "Casimir effect with quantized charged spinor matter in background magnetic field," suggest that a sufficiently strong magnetic field can create a repulsive gravitational force necessary for FTL travel. However, counterarguments highlight that the Casimir effect is short-range and does not support FTL travel, as it does not alter the fundamental structure of spacetime to allow travel outside light cones.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Casimir effect and its implications in quantum physics
  • Familiarity with negative mass concepts and their theoretical applications
  • Knowledge of the Shapiro effect and its relevance in gravitational physics
  • Basic principles of general relativity and spacetime structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Casimir effect on gravitational forces
  • Study the Shapiro effect and its role in understanding light propagation in curved spacetime
  • Explore the theoretical frameworks surrounding negative mass and its potential applications
  • Investigate the relationship between dark energy and the Casimir effect in cosmological contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of quantum mechanics and general relativity, particularly those exploring the frontiers of interstellar travel theories.

member 641893
TL;DR
Does Casimir Vacuum gravitationally repeal matter? If so, there is a way to enhance the effect through B field? If so, what are the consequences for interstellar travel?
I have in mind a way to enable FTL travel. Is this way viable?

In the paper: "Weighing the vacuum with the Archimedes experiment"

we can see the dependency of the gravitational repulsion exerted by Casimir Vacuum on the energy between the plates. The force goes as E / c^2.

In the papers: "Casimir effect with quantized charged spinor matter in background magnetic field"

we can observe that negative energy between the plates can be arbitrarily low if a B field sufficiently strong is provided. Moreover when the B field diverges the total energy (field energy + Casimir vacuum energy) goes to minus infinite. (see equations 85, 106, 107 for the Casimir vacuum energy) So this implies that, if a B field sufficiently strong is provided, we can have an arbitrarily strong repulsive gravitational force: it is exactly what we need in order to make FTL travel possible.

To understand why, read the following: fact is that, when negative mass is involved, the Shapiro effect changes sign so, instead of a Shapiro delay, you'll have a Shapiro 'early arrival'. So, in presence of a negative gravitational mass, light (and ultra relativistic particles or spaceships) cover the distance between A and B in a time shorter than d(A,B)/c0. Where d(. , .) is the ordinary euclidean distance. For the same reason, in presence of a positive gravitational mass, light (and ultra relativistic particles) cover the distance between A and B in a time higher than d(A,B)/c0.

The aforementioned idea (the Shapiro time gain) is not new but was presented in

"Microlensing by natural wormholes: Theory and simulations"
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
The Casimir effect is very short range. It is irrelevant over interstellar distances.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Giovanni Cambria said:
gravitationally speaking 2 Casimir plates are equivalent to a (very tiny) negative mass.

No, they're not. Dark energy, which is basically what the region between two Casimir plates is being described as in the references you give, has positive energy density and negative pressure. This does lead to effects like the accelerated expansion of the universe, but it in no way allows FTL travel.

Giovanni Cambria said:
negative Shapiro delay

Which just means that the path of light through spacetime is different from what one would expect if spacetime were flat, in such a way that the travel time is shorter. But that is a change in the structure of the light cones in spacetime. It is not a way for anything to travel FTL, i.e., outside the light cones.

In short, you have a fundamental misunderstanding.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
768
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K