Is This Story About Being Allergic to Modern Technology a Lie?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the credibility of a story claiming that an individual is allergic to modern technology, specifically focusing on the concept of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). Participants explore the validity of such claims, the lack of scientific evidence, and the psychosomatic aspects associated with reported symptoms.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that electromagnetic hypersensitivity lacks scientific evidence, citing studies where individuals respond to placebos rather than actual electromagnetic radiation.
  • Others mention the absence of a biological mechanism to explain EHS, suggesting it may be psychosomatic or related to mass hysteria.
  • A participant references a literature review indicating that no robust evidence supports the theory that electromagnetic fields trigger symptoms in individuals claiming EHS, while noting the potential role of the nocebo effect.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the claim of hypersensitivity to gamma rays, questioning the validity of such a statement.
  • Another participant draws a parallel between the story and other widely circulated claims, such as the belief that cellular phones cause brain cancer, indicating a general skepticism towards such narratives.
  • Some participants acknowledge personal negative reactions to technology, but attribute these reactions to content rather than electromagnetic exposure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the claims of electromagnetic hypersensitivity, but multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the reported symptoms and their psychological implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on anecdotal evidence and the ongoing debate about the psychological versus physiological origins of the reported symptoms. The discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding the claims of EHS.

tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-443717/Im-allergic-modern-living.html

It sounded pretty believable to me until I read this:

"We have a plasma screen TV because the old style one gave out gamma rays, which brought on my reaction."

Is the story a lie?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
There are tonnes of stories like this out there, the phenomenon is known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity but there is no evidence that it is real. In fact there's plenty of reasons to think that it isn't, like how participants in tests respond to placebos and not to hidden sources of EM radiation. There's also no mechanism in biology that could account for this.

Having said that it clearly is a relatively common condition and it's interesting to note that so many people across the world exhibit the same psychosomatic response. It's possibly related to mass hysteria but I don't know of anything showing that.
 
Until a valid study shows there is evidence, which there is not currently, it's just a story.

Darn, Ryan beat me to it, and did a better job! :biggrin:
 
Evo said:
Until a valid study shows there is evidence, which there is not currently, it's just a story.
It's so annoying that so much is known about this and we know that there's not a shred of evidence for it yet it still does the rounds in print and on the blogosphere. It's pure churnalism.
Evo said:
Darn, Ryan beat me to it, and did a better job! :biggrin:
:shy:
 
Googling, I found this:

An extensive literature search identified 15 new experiments. Including studies reported in our earlier review, 46 blind or double-blind provocation studies in all, involving 1175 IEI-EMF volunteers, have tested whether exposure to electromagnetic fields is responsible for triggering symptoms in IEI-EMF. No robust evidence could be found to support this theory. However, the studies included in the review did support the role of the nocebo effect in triggering acute symptoms in IEI-EMF sufferers.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19681059

At this point there's every reason to believe it's completely psychosomatic.
 
tahayassen said:
"We have a plasma screen TV because the old style one gave out gamma rays, which brought on my reaction."

Hypersensitivity to Gamma rays?!

Hulk01.jpg
 
tahayassen said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-443717/Im-allergic-modern-living.html

It sounded pretty believable to me until I read this:

"We have a plasma screen TV because the old style one gave out gamma rays, which brought on my reaction."

Is the story a lie?

I get a profoundly negative reaction to TV, too. But it's not the "gamma rays" causing it -- it's the content .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its right up there with cellular phones causing brain cancer, IMO.
 
There might be some evidence for it, but nothing significant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
842
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K