MHB Is This the Right Way to Solve a Quadratic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casio1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the quadratic equation 2(x - 5)² = 32. The method presented involves dividing both sides by 2, simplifying to (x - 5)² = 16, and then taking the square root to find x = 9 or x = 1. Participants confirm that this approach is valid and correctly executed. An alternative method using the difference of squares is also suggested, leading to the same roots. Overall, the steps taken to solve the equation are deemed acceptable and accurate.
Casio1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone(Wink)

I have an equation which looks like quadratic to me.

2(x - 5)2 = 32

Can I divide both sides by 2?

(x - 5)2 = 16

Can I take the square root?

x - 5 = + or - 4

if x = 5 plus 4 = 9

if x = 5 - 4 = 1

Therefore my roots would be;

x = 9 or x = 1

Is this method acceptable and the correct way to find the values of x. I know it works out OK but am wondering about the way I have done it?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Casio!

(Yes) Well done. That's exactly how you should do this problem every step of the way.
 
Yes, that is a perfectly valid procedure. All of your steps are correct. (Nod)
 
After dividing by 2, we may also arrange as the difference of squares:

(x - 5)2 - 42 = 0

((x - 5) + 4)((x - 5) - 4) = 0

(x - 1)(x - 9) = 0

x = 1, 9
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top