Is Tyche the Missing Planet in Our Solar System?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bguidry17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Pluto
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothesized planet Tyche and its potential existence within our solar system. Participants explore various aspects of Tyche, including its implications for astronomical observations, its relation to the Pioneer anomaly, and comparisons to other theories and hypotheses regarding celestial bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Tyche is only hypothesized to exist, with no actual detection or evidence confirmed.
  • One participant questions the validity of claims regarding Tyche's inevitable discovery, suggesting it may stem from poor journalism.
  • Another participant argues that while Tyche's existence is hypothesized, it is linked to observed patterns of comet influx, indicating a need for further observational data.
  • There is a mention of Lorenzo Iorio's suggestion that the anomalous precession of Saturn could be explained by Tyche or a smaller planet.
  • One participant draws a controversial connection between Tyche and Zecharia Sitchin's Nibiru, which is met with strong disagreement from others.
  • Some participants discuss the mass of the Oort cloud and its relevance to Tyche's formation, proposing that Tyche could have formed as a binary companion to the Sun.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Tyche is a hypothesis without confirmed evidence, but there is disagreement regarding its implications and connections to other theories, particularly those proposed by Sitchin. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on Tyche's existence and significance.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the evidence for Tyche's existence and the interpretations of observational data. The discussion includes various assumptions about the formation of celestial bodies and the nature of evidence in astronomy.

bguidry17
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/2011/02/15/new-giant-planet-may-repeat-may-be-discovered-in-our-solar-system&s=Opinion

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/up-telescope-search-begins-for-giant-new-planet-2213119.html

Any comments on the planet Tyche? I don't know much about astronomy, but I couldn't find any thread on here about Tyche. It seems absurd to me that we haven't seen it before. Should it be considered a planet? Again, I don't know squat about astronomy, but could Tyche be the cause of the Pioneer anomaly?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tyche is only hypothesized to exist. There has been no actual detection of or evidence for such a planet.
 
Janus said:
Tyche is only hypothesized to exist. There has been no actual detection of or evidence for such a planet.

Of course there's evidence it exists, else it wouldn't have been hypothesized! The difficulty is whether that's the unique explanation for the observed pattern of comet influx - but that's the job of experiment isn't it? Hopefully more data will arise from WISE or some other observation campaign. Lorenzo Iorio suggests the anomalous precession of Saturn could be explained by a Tyche - or a closer, smaller planet. Thus, potentially, another line of evidence. Matese and Whitmire aren't idiots - they've made their claim based on the data, but it's just one option. A definite detection would constitute "proof", but that's not quite the same as evidence. Or is it?
 
Tyche is just the new name for Zecharia Sitchin 's planet Nibiru which he hypothesized. Sitchin also hypothesized that it is inhabited by an alien race called the Anunnaki.
If Janus says "no detection nor evidence for such a planet", then I'll confidently go with that.
 
Helios that's ridiculous! There's no connection between Sitchin'a fantasy and a hypothesized Oort gas giant.
 
The collective mass of the oort cloud is is believed to be no more than about 80 Earth masses and possibly less than 2 Earth masses..
 
Chronos said:
The collective mass of the oort cloud is is believed to be no more than about 80 Earth masses and possibly less than 2 Earth masses..

Kind of irrelevant to the basic question, although true enough. Tyche would presumably have formed as a wide orbit binary companion to the Sun from the same bit of collapsing nebula, rather than forming in the disk around the Sun. Alternatively the Sun might've captured the dust/gas which became the planets from a proto-Tyche, which originally had a large, massive disk and barely condensed core. Lower mass stars collapse slower than heavier stars, thus stars like the Sun would have been smaller and denser than red-dwarf and brown-dwarfs in their common birth nebula, allowing capture events to occur. That would explain why the Sun's rotation is tilted by 7 degrees with respect to the average plane of the planetary orbits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K