Is u=qv or u=0.5qv the correct equation for finding potential energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonutulsiani
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct equations for calculating potential energy in electrostatics are u=qV for a single point charge in an electric field and u=0.5qV for the energy stored in a capacitor. The equation u=qV applies when determining the potential energy of a charge (q) in a voltage (V) field, while u=0.5qV is specifically used for the energy stored in capacitors, which involves integrating over multiple point charges. The distinction lies in the context of application, with electrostatic potential energy being relevant for static electric fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatic potential energy
  • Familiarity with voltage and charge concepts
  • Knowledge of capacitor energy storage
  • Basic grasp of electric field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equation W = q . [V(a) - V(b)] for work done in electric fields
  • Learn about the energy stored in capacitors using the formula u = 0.5CV²
  • Explore the concept of electric field and its relation to potential energy
  • Investigate the differences between static and dynamic electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics or working with capacitors will benefit from this discussion.

sonutulsiani
Messages
136
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok I am really confused!
Sometimes we use u=qv to find the potential energy
and sometimes u=0.5qv
Which one is correct?



Homework Equations



u= electro static potential energy
v= voltage
q is charge

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
That question is very vague. You will have to be more specific of the problem.

U=qV is used for a charge (q) in an electrostatic potential (V). "U" is then the electric potential energy the charge has in that field.

I am not sure about U= 0.5qV, since that is very vague. If you can give an example where it is used, then you might be able to narrow it down.
 
like for energy in a capacitor its used
 
The energy stored in a capacitor is very different than a single point charge in an electric field. The energy stored in a capacitor is actually an integral over many infinitesmal point charges, dq. Since it is a sum, you can't expect it to look like qV.
 
Apparently my textbook writes potential energy of 2 point charges is u=qv
and electrostatic potential energy is u=1/2qv. What is the difference between them other than the word 'electrostatic'
 
Electrostatic just means the electric field isn't changing with time. So you can use it interchangeably with electric for most of your cases. You can say the electrostatic potential energy of 2 point charges is U = qV, since there is no time dependence that would cause magnetic fields.

For your U = 1/2 qV, you must be reading about capacitance and the stored energy in the electric field of the charges. They are both different, and shouldn't get them too confused from a question you might be asked.
 
u = q v is for electrical potential energy
for those who gave the example of capacitors:
u = 0.5 c v^2
 
sonutulsiani said:

Homework Statement



Ok I am really confused!
Sometimes we use u=qv to find the potential energy
and sometimes u=0.5qv
Which one is correct?

I will try to sharp two eqn above based on common textbook,

1) W = q . [V(a) - V(b)]

this eqn tells us for the work done to move a charge from point (a) to point (b). V here means potential difference between points (a) and (b).

2) W = \frac{1}{2}\Sigma^{n}_{i=1} q_i V(r_i)

this eqn tells about work it takes to assemble a configuration of point charge. so W here represents energy stored in the configuration. factor 1/2 here is used to restore the eqn that initially count twice. (if you confused what I mean, you can check for yourself the derivation of this eqn). this eqn is more about the energy of a point charge distribution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K