Is Uniform Circular Motion Considered Equilibrium?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a body in uniform circular motion can be considered in equilibrium. Participants explore the definitions and conditions of equilibrium in the context of circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the nature of uniform circular motion and its relation to equilibrium, discussing the role of centripetal force and net forces acting on the body.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts of equilibrium and forces involved in uniform circular motion. Some participants assert that the presence of centripetal force indicates that the body is not in equilibrium, while others seek further clarification on the definitions and implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering different scenarios of circular motion, such as a rotating bar versus a planet orbiting a star, which may influence their understanding of equilibrium in this context.

m.medhat
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if a body is in a uniform circular motion . is it in equilibrium?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i think it is not in equilibrium ... please i want the true solution .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi m.medhat! :smile:
m.medhat said:
if a body is in a uniform circular motion . is it in equilibrium?

When you say "a body is in a uniform circular motion", do you mean like a bar rotating about its centre, or do you mean like a planet rotating around a star? :confused:
 
Is the object's rotational motion changing with time? If not it is in equilibrium, for an object to be in "mechanical" equilibrium the net torque acting on the object must be zero.
 
i know that a body in equilibrium , the net force acting on it must be zero .
but for the body in uniform circular motion , there is a force acting on it , it is the centripetal force , and the net force here -as i think- not equal zero but equal to centripetal force .
i still need help please .
 
m.medhat said:
i know that a body in equilibrium , the net force acting on it must be zero .
but for the body in uniform circular motion , there is a force acting on it , it is the centripetal force , and the net force here -as i think- not equal zero but equal to centripetal force .

Yes, that's exactly correct :smile:

a body moving with constant angular velocity round a circle (ie not simply rotating on its own centre of mass) is not in equilibrium …

F = ma for that body shows, on the left, the gravitational force or the tension or whatever is forcing it towards the centre, and on the right, (mass times) the centripetal acceleration.

(The left is physics, the right is just geometry … a body moving round a circle must have centripetal acceleration, because the geometry says so. :wink:)

Because of F = ma, since (for constant angular velocity) the acceleration is centripetal, that means that the net force must be centripetal also. :smile:
 
then this means that the body moving with a uniform circular motion is not in equilibrium , isn't it ?

many thanks for answer .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
884
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K