Is xTAx always non-zero for a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix A?

Click For Summary
For a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix A, the expression xTAx is indeed non-zero for any non-zero vector x. This is because such matrices are diagonalizable, and in their diagonal form, the eigenvalues are all positive due to the nonsingularity of A. Consequently, the quadratic form xTAx will yield a positive value for any non-zero x. The discussion emphasizes the importance of diagonalization in understanding the properties of the matrix. Therefore, xTAx is always non-zero for x≠0.
elimax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Basic question, I think, but I'm not sure. It is a step in a demonstration, so it would be nice if it were true.
smile.gif


True or false? Why? If A is a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix, then xTAx≠0 for x≠0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since ##A## is real and symmetric, it is diagonalizable. So you may start by thinking about ##x^T A x## in a basis in which ##A## is diagonal.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K