Is Your Home Contaminated with Corrosive Chinese Drywall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential contamination of homes with corrosive Chinese drywall, particularly focusing on its health impacts, legal ramifications, and the responsibilities of builders versus homeowners. Participants explore the origins of the drywall, its effects on property and health, and the implications for buyers and builders.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the drywall contains sulfur or sulfur compounds, leading to health issues such as respiratory problems, headaches, and nosebleeds.
  • It is noted that homes built after 2000, particularly in humid areas like Florida, are more likely to be affected by this issue.
  • There is a suggestion that the responsibility lies with home builders who purchased the drywall, rather than individual homeowners who may have made uninformed choices.
  • Some participants propose that the only solution is to replace all affected drywall, while others discuss the legal actions being taken by homeowners against builders and manufacturers.
  • Concerns are raised about the legal protections for homeowners in the U.S., including the statute of limitations for contract law and the implications of "Caveat Emptor."
  • One participant expresses surprise at the profitability of importing drywall, questioning the cost-effectiveness given transportation expenses.
  • There is a mention of the fragmented nature of home construction, where builders subcontract various tasks, complicating accountability for material quality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding responsibility for the drywall issue, the extent of the problem, and the effectiveness of legal recourse. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best course of action or the implications for homeowners and builders.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in legal protections for homeowners and the complexities of subcontracting in home construction, which may affect accountability for the use of defective materials.

edward
Messages
73
Reaction score
165
They got us again. The drywall contains sulfur or sulfur compounds.

If a homeowner purchased a new home, or condominium after 2000, has blackened, or charred electrical wires inside an interior electrical receptacle, there is a good chance they have the imported toxic Chinese drywall. The product was first introduced to the US in late 2000 or early 2001 and was primarily used in new US subdivisions, condominiums or home remodeling jobs.

Homeowners could suffer from severe respiratory issues, headaches and nosebleeds. Homes may have a sulphur (rotten eggs) type of smell and air conditioning coils, stove top oven elements and refrigerators may fail at an excessively high rate.

http://www.constructiondigital.com/MarketSector/Construction-Equipment-and-Materials/Report--Use-of-toxic-Chinese-drywall-rampant_18759.aspx

Originally reported as being used primarily in Florida and California, this link indicates more widespread distribution.

There are a number of class action law suits filed by owners and builders.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
If one buys cheap/inexpensive, low quality imports, one is at risk.

Buy domestically produced goods from companies that adhere to quality standards (ASTM).
 
"You get what you pay for"
 
This wasn't a case of individuals making a bad choice on a product purchase.

It was the home builders who were buying it. The new home buyers got stuck with it.

The only way to solve the problem is to rip out all of the drywall and replace it. Buyers are suing builders and the builders are trying to sue the Chinese companies who manufactured the dry wall. No one really knows how extensive the problem is.

Florida due to it's high humidity noticed the problem first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kHq_H3l7aE&feature=PlayList&p=EAE83B4A1C44AB22&index=0&playnext=1
 
edward said:
This wasn't a case of individuals making a bad choice on a product purchase.

It was the home builders who were buying it. The new home buyers got stuck with it.

The only way to solve the problem is to rip out all of the drywall and replace it. Buyers are suing builders and the builders are trying to sue the Chinese companies who manufactured the dry wall. No one really knows how extensive the problem is.

Florida due to it's high humidity noticed the problem first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kHq_H3l7aE&feature=PlayList&p=EAE83B4A1C44AB22&index=0&playnext=1
For the home builders, IMO unless there has been a breach of building regulations governing the composition of dry wall or the Chinese manufacturers did not provide materials to the home builders specs then I'd think this will simply fall into the category of Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware).

The home owner may have recourse against the home builder but in the US the statute of limitations for contract law is a maximum of 4 years. This is from when the breach happened, ie delivery, not from when the breach was found. In some parts of Europe this warranty is extended to 10 years in the case of property purchases. I don't know if the US makes similar exceptions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm a bit surprised it's profitable to import drywall.
You'd think that for such a cheap product which is comparatively bulky, the transport costs would add significant overhead.
 
Art said:
For the home builders, IMO unless there has been a breach of building regulations governing the composition of dry wall or the Chinese manufacturers did not provide materials to the home builders specs then I'd think this will simply fall into the category of Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware).

The home owner may have recourse against the home builder but in the US the statute of limitations for contract law is a maximum of 4 years. This is from when the breach happened, ie delivery, not from when the breach was found. In some parts of Europe this warranty is extended to 10 years in the case of property purchases. I don't know if the US makes similar exceptions.

The U.S has very poor protection for home buyers.

Some of the big home builders don't even buy the materials that go into a new home, nor do they have construction workers. They subcontract everything out. A concrete company pours the slab, a framing company builds the structure, then another company applies the siding or stucco.

Next the roofers, electricians ,drywall , flooring, plumbers, and AC contractors arrive in sequence. The builder just coordinates the subs. Each sub buys his materials from a wholesaler.
 
Last edited: