Isolated Human Population: A New Species?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leroyjenkens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human population
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An isolated human population that becomes unable to interbreed with other humans would likely be classified as a different species according to the Biological Species Concept, which defines species based on interbreeding capabilities. This concept is widely accepted but not universally agreed upon, as it poses challenges for paleontologists studying ancient species. The definition hinges on the ability of gametes from different organisms to fuse and produce viable zygotes, which is not always indicated by physical differences. Additionally, hybrid species such as ligers and mules illustrate the complexities of species classification based on reproductive viability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Biological Species Concept
  • Knowledge of gamete fusion and zygote viability
  • Familiarity with species classification challenges in paleontology
  • Awareness of hybrid species and their reproductive limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the different definitions of species, including the Biological Species Concept and others
  • Explore the implications of hybrid species on species classification
  • Study the reproductive mechanisms of various animal species
  • Investigate the role of human intervention in plant species classification
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, evolutionary scientists, paleontologists, and anyone interested in species classification and reproductive biology.

leroyjenkens
Messages
621
Reaction score
49
If there was an isolated human population that eventually became unable to breed with any humans outside of their population, would they become classified as a different species than us?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
That depends on your definition of 'species,' which isn't at all agreed upon.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_concept#Definitions_of_species
The "Biological Species concept" defines a species as a group of interbreeding organisms, so according to this group of thought, yes--they would be classified as a different species.

The biological species concept is (possibly) the most popular... to answer your question more simply: yeah, I guess so--but not everyone would agree.
 
As it was put to me, one major difficulty with the breeding capability definition of species is for Palaeontologists dealing with ancient species. Clearly, they cannot apply such a test and thus have to use different criteria. For modern species, breeding capability is the usual definition, but it is a much misunderstood point. I have often seen people talk about breeds of dogs, and the impracticality of a very large dog cross-breeding with a toy breed. But that is not the point. It is all a simple question of whether a gamete of one sex from one organism can fuse with a gamete of the other sex from another organism to produce a viable zygote. That is a matter of how well the chromosomes match up, and is not necessarily indicated by obvious physical differences in the parent organisms, however extreme.

There is also, of course a further subtlety around so-called ‘hybrid’ species. Famously it is possible to cross a lion and a tiger, which certainly does prove that, in evolutionary terms, their divergence was relatively recent. However, the Liger is necessarily infertile – its gametes will fuse with nothing, not even that of another Liger. Likewise for mules and various other hybrid species. So the key for definition as the same species is that gametes from each can produce a viable zygote that can develop into a fertile adult. That definition works pretty well for animal species, but even that is much more open to being undermined by the realities of what is possible with the intervention of human kind when it comes to plant species.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K