Isolating a variable when variable is in both sides of equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sn0man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
Sn0man
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


y=(2-x)/(5x)

Solving for x=f(y)

I can get as far as 5xy=(2-x)

Tried 5xy=-1(x+2)

All attempts at solving this have given me the wrong answer, and I end up with x on both sides of the equation.

Stuck and not sure what to do.

Correct answer is x=2/(5y+1) , but I don't know how to get there.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with what you know and go step by step.

From the given equation:
  1. Multiply both members by 5x.
  2. Add the additive inverse of you-know-what to both sides.
  3. Can you then see to combine two terms of the variable, x ?
  4. ...And if you did, then you can finish, finding x as a formula of y.
 
Sn0man said:

Homework Statement


y=(2-x)/(5x)

Solving for x=f(y)

I can get as far as 5xy=(2-x)
This the same as 5xy= 2- x, you don't need the parentheses. If you want x only on the left, then add x to both sides.

Tried 5xy=-1(x+2)

All attempts at solving this have given me the wrong answer, and I end up with x on both sides of the equation.

Stuck and not sure what to do.

Correct answer is x=2/(5y+1) , but I don't know how to get there.

Thanks for any help!
 
The best way to solve this problem would be to separate the division part, that is to say 2/(5x)- x/(5x) = 2/(5x) - 1/5, then multiply all by 5x to get
5xy=2-x. Now add x to both sides to get 5xy+x = 2. Now do you notice something? We can factor this to x(5y+1)=2, divide by 5y+1 to get x=2/(5y+1)
Bonaparte
 
Bonaparte said:
The best way to solve this problem would be to separate the division part, that is to say 2/(5x)- x/(5x) = 2/(5x) - 1/5, then multiply all by 5x to get
5xy=2-x. Now add x to both sides to get 5xy+x = 2. Now do you notice something? We can factor this to x(5y+1)=2, divide by 5y+1 to get x=2/(5y+1)



Bonaparte

Aha! Of course...thats what I was missing! I was so close just forgot to factor the x out.

Thanks very much - this problem was really getting under my skin!
 
Bonaparte said:
The best way to solve this problem would be to separate the division part, that is to say 2/(5x)- x/(5x) = 2/(5x) - 1/5, then multiply all by 5x to get
5xy=2-x. Now add x to both sides to get 5xy+x = 2. Now do you notice something? We can factor this to x(5y+1)=2, divide by 5y+1 to get x=2/(5y+1)



Bonaparte

Separating the division is both an unnecessary step and makes things harder.
 
Sn0man said:

Homework Statement


y=(2-x)/(5x)

Solving for x=f(y)

An alternate method:
[itex]\displaystyle y=\frac{2-x}{5x}[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle 5y=\frac{2-x}{x}[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle 5y=\frac{2}{x}-1[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle 5y+1=\frac{2}{x}[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle x=\frac{2}{5y+1}[/itex]​
 
symbolipoint said:
NOT necessarily, in case it helps the o.p. to understand.
Good point.

In this case, breaking up the rational expression (separating the division) leaves only one term with x in it -- a fairly uncomplicated term at that. This makes it rather easy to solve for x.
 
symbolipoint said:
NOT necessarily, in case it helps the o.p. to understand.

I wouldn't think to explain to a student that's working with functions and factorizing that (a+b)/c is the same as a/c+b/c, but I suppose I shouldn't make that assumption.
 
Mentallic, not that you too separated the division part, just later.
That was from (2-x)/x to 2/x-x/x. You are right that it is not necessary, but when he gets to much more complicated problems, I personally find it helpful to separate. Where you separated you could have multiplied by x both sides and continue, you are perfectly right that it is not "necessary".

Bonaparte
 
Actually, when working the problem forward again myself, Mentallic is right, that splitting the rational expression into a sum (or a difference) should not be necessary. The problem can be solved in four steps (slightly differently than #7, SammyS). Myself, I found no use in splitting the expression into sum or difference.
 
I'm tired of repeating myself, of course it is not necessary, I disagree it makes things harder however. I will rather spend a extra 30 seconds to separate then have the O.P. not understand and explain. Please use your time more efficiently and help others.

Thanks, Bonparte