Isolating a variable in an exponent

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatguythere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent Variable
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around isolating a variable in an exponential equation, specifically in the context of the equation N=Noe^(-ux). Participants are working with given values for No, u, and N, and are attempting to solve for the variable x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their attempts to rearrange the equation and apply logarithmic properties to isolate x. There are questions regarding the order of operations and the correct interpretation of the constants involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the logarithmic approach needed to isolate x, while others are exploring different interpretations of the constants and their implications on the calculations. There is a recognition of confusion regarding the use of the natural logarithm versus logarithms of different bases.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the use of certain methods or require specific values to be used. There is also mention of potential typos in the values provided, which adds to the complexity of the discussion.

thatguythere
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I had to find out
N=Noe-ux
Where No=1.5,e is the elementary charge, u=-0.068 and x=0.07
I came to the answer 1.221

Now I need to find x if u =-0.036, N=1.221 and No remains 1.5

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I reduce the equation to the following

ln(N/No)=-ux

The problem is that when I plug my numbers from the original problem into this I end up getting the following

ln(1.221/1.5)=-(-0.068)x
-0.2058=0.068x
-3.02= x

This is clearly incorrect since I know x should be 0.07.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thatguythere said:

Homework Statement


So I had to find out
N=Noe-ux
Where No=1.5,e is the elementary charge, u=-0.068 and x=0.07
I came to the answer 1.221
I get something different.

thatguythere said:
Now I need to find x if u =-0.036, N=1.221 and No remains 1.5
I'll assume u = -0.036 is a typo because it looks as though you want to use u = -0.068 again.

Just check your answer for N again, and see if that changes anything.
 
My order of operations was wrong then?

So I get 1.273

Now -0.036 was NOT a typo, however I am ignoring it, as I am using the original numbers to try to figure out how to isolate x. However, when I plug this new number in, I still end up with x = -2.413 instead of 0.07 which it should be.
Clearly I am doing something very wrong and have no idea what.
 
Let me illustrate step by step.

N=Noe-ux
N=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(0.07)
N=1.5*0.0960.07
N=1.5*0.849
N=1.274

Now I try to reverse it to figure out how to isolate x, this is where I do something very wrong I believe.

N=Noe-ux
1.274=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(x)
0.849=1.6x10-19(0.068)(x)
ln0.849=0.068x
-0.164=0.068x
-2.41=x

But we know x=0.07. I'm lost.
 
thatguythere said:
My order of operations was wrong then?

So I get 1.273
Sorry, I mistook e as being the natural exponential 2.718...
We're supposed to be using e=1.602\cdot10^{-19}, right?

Using the figures:
N_0 = 1.5
e=1.602\cdot 10^{-19}
u=-0.068
x=0.07

You should get N\approx 1.22
 
thatguythere said:
N=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(0.07)
N=1.5*0.0960.07

How did you go from the first to the second step?
 
I got it.
 
Haha Ok so I was correct in the first place when I posted 1.221. Then I was trying to figure out what I did wrong which would explain your confusion over my next process.
 
thatguythere said:
I did 1.6x10-19(0.068)
Is that improper order of operations?

Yes, it's not correct.

(n\cdot a^b)^{cd} = n^{cd}\cdot a^{bcd}

But you've done something else.
Of course, calculating them in this way is the long and inefficient way, so you'd instead enter it as so:

(1.6E-19)^(0.068*0.07)

EDIT: most of this is redundant, you already know it :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
thatguythere said:
Haha Ok so I was correct in the first place when I posted 1.221. Then I was trying to figure out what I did wrong which would explain your confusion over my next process.

Oh yeah sorry, that's my fault!

As for the second part of the problem where you're trying to find x, you've done essentially what confused me as well.

ln(N/No)=-ux

Remember that ln = loge is the natural logarithm, or in other words, it reverses the natural exponential operator.

If a=e^{b} then \ln(a)=b but we don't have the natural exponential (e=2.718...) here, we have another base altogether, so what we'd need to do to reverse the exponent operation is to take the log with base 1.6\cdot 10^{-19}

But your calculator probably doesn't have the option of choosing any base for the logarithm, so you instead use the formula

\log_ab=\frac{\log_cb}{\log_ca}

So we have that

\log_{1.6\cdot 10^{-19}}(1.221/1.5) = \frac{\ln (1.221/1.5)}{\ln(1.6\cdot 10^{-19})}
 
  • #11
Let me try then.
 
  • #12
Are you saying that
\frac{ln(1.221/1.5)}{ln(1.6E-19)}=-ux?
 
  • #13
Yep!
 
  • #14
Yeah, I got that. So using -0.036, I come up with 0.132. Excellent.
 
  • #15
Thank you very much.
 
  • #16
You're welcome! And sorry about the confusion at the start.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K