Iterating through an infinite ordered set

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ookke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on iterating through an infinite totally ordered set, denoted as S, and the implications of performing operations on an initially empty set A. The operation involves checking if A contains an element larger than the current element x from S. If not, an element y greater than x is selected and added to A. However, due to the nature of infinite sets, this process leads to a paradox where no elements are added to A, resulting in an infinite loop. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of a "well-ordered" or "reverse well-ordered" structure to avoid such infinite iterations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with totally ordered sets
  • Knowledge of well-ordering principles
  • Basic concepts of set theory and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of well-ordered sets in set theory
  • Explore the implications of infinite sets in mathematical logic
  • Learn about reverse well-ordering and its applications
  • Investigate algorithms that handle infinite data structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and anyone interested in theoretical computer science and set theory, particularly those exploring infinite structures and their operational challenges.

Ookke
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
If we want to do a specific operation for each element in a set in specific order, is there some limitations for that?

Here is an example that seems to lead a bit strange conclusion:

Let S be an infinite totally ordered set without maximal element and A an empty set to begin with.

For each element x in S, do the following operation:
If set A contains element larger than x, do nothing.
Else, select y > x and add it into A.
Do these operations in descending order, i.e. if x < y, process y before processing x.

Now it seems that each iteration for x makes sure that A will contain an element larger than x, yet no iteration will actually add anything to A: For each x being iterated, some y > x must have been iterated earlier, resulting that there already must be element larger than x in A. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right - it seems that the machine will be caught in an infinite loop looking for the largest element.
 
For "step-by-step" operations of this kind, the usual requirement on the ordered set would be "well ordered" (or in your case, reverse well ordered).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K