Jacobian matrix determinant vanishes

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
What exactly does it mean when the determinant of a Jacobian matrix vanishes? Does that imply that the coordinate transformation is not a good one?

How do you know if you coordinate transformation is a good one or a bad one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me explain further. This is the particular transformation I am looking at:

[itex]\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x(t) \\<br /> y(t) \\<br /> z(t)<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)= R_{z}(\gamma) R_{x}(\beta) R_{z}(\alpha)\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_o \\<br /> y_o \\<br /> z_o<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex],

here, the vector [itex](x_{o},y_{o},z_{o})[/itex] is just the initial positions of small pieces of a solid cube, and the angles [itex]\alpha(t)[/itex],[itex]\beta(t)[/itex],[itex]\gamma(t)[/itex] are the Euler angles (all functions of time).

When I expand this out, and form the Jacobian matrix, it's determinant vanishes.
 
Probably there is a mistake in your calculation. In the standard forms, the determinant of Rx , Ry and Rz all are 1.0 , for any angles. So is the determinant of their product.