MHB Janet's question at Yahoo Answers involving the Witch of Agnesi

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around parameterizing the Witch of Agnesi curve derived from a geometric setup involving a circle and specific points in the xy-plane. The parameterization is established as W(t) = (2a tan t, 2a cos² t), with x_M and y_M defined in relation to point P on the circle. The Cartesian equation is derived by eliminating the parameter t, resulting in y = 8a³ / (x² + 4a²). This transformation showcases the relationship between the parameterization and the Cartesian form of the curve. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical derivation and properties of the Witch of Agnesi.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Parameterize and cartesian equation problem?

If P is any point on the circle C in the xy-plane of radius a >0 and center (0,a),let the straight line through the origin and P intersect the line y = 2a at Q, and let the line through P parallel to the x-axis intersect the line through Q parallel to the y-axis at M. As P moves around C, M traces out a curve called the witch of Agnesi.
For this curve, prove that it can be parameterized as W (t) = (2a tan t, 2a cos2 t). Fi- nally, use this parameterization to find a cartesian equation for the curve by eliminating the variable t.

Here is the original question:

Parameterize and cartesian equation problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.

edit: I see now that the question has been deleted. According to the guidelines there it is okay to post links to a site to offer more information on a question, so I can only speculate as to why it was deleted. (Headbang)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Janet,

Please refer to the following diagram:

View attachment 570

Let point M be at $(x_M,y_M)$, and point P be at $(x_P,y_P)$

As you can see, we may state:

$\displaystyle \tan(t)=\frac{x_M}{2a}\,\therefore\,x_M=2a\tan(t)$

We may also state:

$\displaystyle \tan(t)=\frac{x_P}{y_M}$

$\displaystyle y_M=x_P\cot(t)=a\sin(2t)\cot(t)=2a\cos^2(t)$

I made the observation that:

$\displaystyle x_P=a\sin(2t)$ from the requirements:

$\displaystyle x_P(0)=0,\,x_P\left(\frac{\pi}{4} \right)=a,\,x_P\left(\frac{\pi}{2} \right)=0$

And so we have the parametrization:

$\displaystyle M(t)=\langle 2a\tan(t),2a\cos^2(t) \rangle$

Now, to eliminate the parameter to obtain a Cartesian representation of the curve, we may write:

$\displaystyle t=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{2a} \right)$

Now substituting into the y-component, we find:

$\displaystyle y=2a\cos^2\left(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{2a} \right) \right)=\frac{8a^3}{x^2+4a^2}$
 

Attachments

  • witchofAgnesi.jpg
    witchofAgnesi.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top