MHB Jordan-Holder Theorem for Groups .... Aluffi, Theorem 3.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying aspects of Aluffi's proof of the Jordan-Hölder Theorem, specifically regarding the relationships between subgroups \( G_1 \) and \( G_1' \). It is established that if \( G_1 \neq G_1' \), then \( G_1 G_1' = G \) because \( G_1 G_1' \) is normal in \( G \) and contains both subgroups. Additionally, it is shown that \( G_1 \subset G_1 G_1' \) holds true since the identity element is included in \( G_1' \). The proof further indicates that the factor group \( G/G_1 \) is simple, leading to the conclusion that the only normal subgroup containing \( G_1 \) is \( G \) itself. This discussion highlights the intricate relationships within group theory as presented in Aluffi's work.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paolo Aluffi's book, Algebra: Chapter 0 ... I am currently focused on Chapter 4, Section 3: Composition Series and Solvability ...

I need help with an aspect of Aluffi's proof of the Jordan-Holder Theorem (Theorem 3.2, page 206) which reads as follows:

Theorem 3.2 and the early part of the proof read as follows:View attachment 4912
etc ... etc
In the above proof we read:

" ... ... We may assume $$G_1 \neq {G'}_1$$. Note that $$G_1 {G'}_1 = G$$: indeed, $$G_1 {G'}_1$$ is normal in $$G$$ and $$G_1 \subset G_1 {G'}_1$$ ... ... "
Question 1

Why does it follow from $$G_1 \neq {G'}_1$$ that $$G_1 {G'}_1 = G$$ ... ... ?Question 2

Further, how does it follow that $$G_1 {G'}_1$$ is normal in $$G$$ ... ?Question 3

Further yet, how does it follow that $$G_1 \subset G_1 {G'}_1$$ ... ... ?
I hope that someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,
Peter said:
Question 1

Why does it follow from $$G_1 \neq {G'}_1$$ that $$G_1 {G'}_1 = G$$ ... ... ?

This question will be answered after I answer Questions 2 and 3. ;)
Question 2

Further, how does it follow that $$G_1 {G'}_1$$ is normal in $$G$$ ... ?

Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are normal subgroups of a group $G$, then $AB$ is normal in $G$. Apply this result with $A = G_1$ and $B = G_1^{'}$.
Question 3

Further yet, how does it follow that $$G_1 \subset G_1 {G'}_1$$ ... ... ?

Since $e\in G_1^{'}$, for all $g \in G_1$, $g = g\cdot e \in G_1 G_1^{'}$. Therefore, $G_1\subset G_1 G_1^{'}$.

Now, having answered the last two questions, I can answer Question 1. If $G_1 \neq G_1^{'}$, then there is some $g\in G_1^{'}$ such that $g\notin G_1$. So then $g = e\cdot g \in G_1G_1^{'}$, even though $g\notin G_1$. This means $G_1 \neq G_1G_1^{'}$. But since $G_1\subseteq G_1G_1^{'}$, we have $G_1 \subsetneq G_1 G_1^{'}$.

Consider the factor group $G/G_1$. It is a simple group by construction of the composition series, so it has no nontrivial normal subgroups. Using the lattice isomorphism theorem, we deduce that this is equivalent to there being no normal subgroups $N$ of $G$ such that $G_1 \subsetneq N \subsetneq G$. Since $N = G_1G_1^{'}$ is normal in $G$ and satisfies $G_1 \subsetneq N \subset G$, then by the previous statement, the only possibility is that $N = G$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

This question will be answered after I answer Questions 2 and 3. ;)Recall that if $A$ and $B$ are normal subgroups of a group $G$, then $AB$ is normal in $G$. Apply this result with $A = G_1$ and $B = G_1^{'}$.

Since $e\in G_1^{'}$, for all $g \in G_1$, $g = g\cdot e \in G_1 G_1^{'}$. Therefore, $G_1\subset G_1 G_1^{'}$.

Now, having answered the last two questions, I can answer Question 1. If $G_1 \neq G_1^{'}$, then there is some $g\in G_1^{'}$ such that $g\notin G_1$. So then $g = e\cdot g \in G_1G_1^{'}$, even though $g\notin G_1$. This means $G_1 \neq G_1G_1^{'}$. But since $G_1\subseteq G_1G_1^{'}$, we have $G_1 \subsetneq G_1 G_1^{'}$.

Consider the factor group $G/G_1$. It is a simple group by construction of the composition series, so it has no nontrivial normal subgroups. Using the lattice isomorphism theorem, we deduce that this is equivalent to there being no normal subgroups $N$ of $G$ such that $G_1 \subsetneq N \subsetneq G$. Since $N = G_1G_1^{'}$ is normal in $G$ and satisfies $G_1 \subsetneq N \subset G$, then by the previous statement, the only possibility is that $N = G$.
Thanks so much for the help, Euge ... it is much appreciated ...

Just working through your post now ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K