Jupiter-sized Planet Lurking in Oort Cloud?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis of a Jupiter-sized planet existing in the Oort Cloud, primarily based on cometary deflections and the peculiar orbit of Sedna. Most solar system astronomers reject this notion, asserting that the dynamics of the solar system can be accurately explained by known celestial bodies. The adjustment of Neptune's mass following Voyager's flyby has resolved previous discrepancies in Uranus' orbit, further discrediting the Planet X theory. The consensus emphasizes that the unexplained eccentricity of Sedna's orbit remains a mystery, with many astronomers advocating for a straightforward acknowledgment of uncertainty rather than speculative theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics
  • Familiarity with the Oort Cloud and its significance in astronomy
  • Knowledge of the characteristics and orbits of trans-Neptunian objects, particularly Sedna
  • Awareness of historical adjustments in planetary mass measurements, specifically Neptune
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the dynamics of the Oort Cloud and its role in the solar system
  • Study the orbital characteristics of Sedna and other trans-Neptunian objects
  • Examine the implications of Voyager's flyby data on Neptune's mass
  • Explore the methodologies used in cometary deflection analysis
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in planetary science and the dynamics of the solar system will benefit from this discussion.

sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Lately I've read some articles about the possibility of a Jupiter-sized planet hidden in the Oort cloud.

This assertion is based on analysis of cometary deflections and observations of Sedna.

What is the likelihood of this?

We all know that there must be lots of planet-sized stuff out there besides Sedna, but Jupiter-sized?
If Neptune and Uranus have been known for so long, then how could a Jupiter-sized planet remain undetected for all this time?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The consensus among most solar system astronomers is "No". They have pretty much nailed the dynamics of the solar system pretty using just the known bodies in the solar system. The last nail in the Planet X coffin was an adjustment to Neptune's mass based on the very well-observed flyby of Voyager. Before this adjustment, there was a small unexplained discrepancy in Uranus' orbit.

Every branch of science has its share of not-quite woo-woos, astronomy included. The news media likes the woo-woos more than the boring non-woo-woos. The non-woo-woos are boring.

The best current answer of Sedna's currently unexplained eccentricity is that we don't know. Most astronomers say just that. A well-reasoned "we don't know" does not sit well with journalists. They want a sensationalistic answer to help garner readers. More readers = more $$ from advertisers. Anything beyond "we don't know" is baseless conjecture. Some fringish astronomers like to make baseless conjectures, partly because the newsies eat that stuff up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K