Just a question regarding Q.M text by griffith.

  • Thread starter Thread starter haplo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffith Text
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics textbook as a primary resource for preparing for graduate-level quantum mechanics courses. Participants consider whether supplementary texts are necessary and compare Griffiths with other materials.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the adequacy of Griffiths' text for graduate preparation, noting that the problems encountered so far seem insufficiently challenging.
  • Another participant expresses a strong negative opinion about Griffiths, labeling it as a "terrible book."
  • A participant confirms they are in graduate school and recommends using Shankar's text alongside Griffiths, suggesting that Griffiths may lack depth and important discussions.
  • One participant shares a similar impression of Griffiths when compared to Robinett's Quantum Mechanics text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the quality of Griffiths' textbook, with some recommending supplementary materials while others criticize its content. No consensus is reached regarding its effectiveness.

Contextual Notes

Participants' evaluations of the textbooks are based on personal experiences and comparisons, which may depend on individual learning preferences and academic backgrounds.

haplo
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Wondering if your professor using this as main text, how good will it prepare you for Graduate Q.M course. Would you recommend to simultaneously study material from some other text. I wonder because we are finishing chapter 2 and problems do not seem that challenging, just bunch of integral evaluation and some derivations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I used it for my undergrad Quantum course. It's a terrible book.
 
are you in grad school now?
 
haplo said:
are you in grad school now?
Yes.

I highly recommend picking up something like Shankar to supplement Griffiths. Griffiths' book is, at best, watered down, and at worst, completely lacking important discussions.
 
thats the impression i am having, while comparing it to Q.M by Robinett.

thanks for reply
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K