JWST breaks another Redshift record

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Oldman too
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    jwst Redshift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent paper highlights the discovery of a galaxy with a photometric redshift of 𝑧 = 16.7, formed approximately 250 million years after the Big Bang, utilizing data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This finding emphasizes JWST's capability to set and break astronomical records, particularly in the search for Population III stars. The paper's Section 6.2 details the findings related to this object, showcasing JWST's advanced UV observational capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photometric redshift concepts
  • Familiarity with Population III stars and their significance in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the James Webb Space Telescope's instrumentation and capabilities
  • Basic comprehension of the Big Bang theory and cosmic timeline
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of photometric redshift in galaxy formation studies
  • Explore the capabilities of JWST's micro-shutter system for simultaneous observations
  • Investigate the significance of Population III stars in the early universe
  • Learn about the methodologies used in deep field imaging by JWST compared to Hubble
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in early universe studies, particularly those focusing on galaxy formation and the capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope.

Oldman too
Messages
259
Reaction score
489
TL;DR
A new paper puts a Galaxy's Redshift at z = 16.7
A paper just out seems to describe a galaxy formed ~250 myr after the BB. One of many records that JWST will be both setting and breaking as the data pours in. With the papers focus on UV, this is probably going to be a Pop 3 star search. Section 6.2 of the paper describes the studies findings on the object in question.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.12356.pdf
"Finally in addition to the other sources discussed earlier in this
work we highlight the apparent discovery of an object with a well
constrained photometric redshift of 𝑧 = 16.7L corresponding to a
time just ' 250 myr after the big bang"
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: afmayer, Drakkith, ohwilleke and 3 others
Space news on Phys.org
Oldman too said:
Summary: A new paper puts a Galaxy's Redshift at z = 16.7

A paper just out seems to describe a galaxy formed ~250 myr after the BB. One of many records that JWST will be both setting and breaking as the data pours in. With the papers focus on UV, this is probably going to be a Pop 3 star search. Section 6.2 of the paper describes the studies findings on the object in question.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.12356.pdf
"Finally in addition to the other sources discussed earlier in this
work we highlight the apparent discovery of an object with a well
constrained photometric redshift of 𝑧 = 16.7L corresponding to a
time just ' 250 myr after the big bang"
Wow!
What are limitations? Presumably these images are no where near the exposure time of Hubble?
Hubble took a few weeks on the famous deep field and Webb produced far higher resolution/detail of the same area in 12 hours.
Does this mean Webb spending 4 weeks on one spot will produce the deepest that can be achieved?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too and vanhees71
pinball1970 said:
Wow!
That's what I said too!
pinball1970 said:
What are limitations?
I think Webb just may push limitations to the limit, what would z = 20 look like on the cosmological timeline? https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11558
pinball1970 said:
Does this mean Webb spending 4 weeks on one spot will produce the deepest that can be achieved?
Not really sure, it doesn't look like 4 weeks of exposure would accomplish anything that 12 to 24 hours total time won't do. As for one spot, with the micro-shutter system, this is one multitasking telescope, roughly 250,000 independent shutters means a lot of targets can be simultaneously studied.
https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-ne...nstrumentation/nirspec-micro-shutter-assembly
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, vanhees71 and pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
27K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K