MHB K-Algebra - Meaning and background of the concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am trying to understand the concept of a k-algebra without much success.

Can someone please give me a clear explanation of the background, definition and use of the concept.

Also I would be extremely grateful of some examples of k-algebras

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic ideal of a $k$-algebra is quite simple. A $k$-algebra is merely a $k$ vector space which also happens to be a ring.

The prototypical example is the polynomial ring $k[x_1, \ldots ,x_n]$. A noncommutative $k$-algebra would be $M_n(k)$, the $n \times n$ matrices with entries in $k$. Both of these objects are rings, you can add or multiply two polynomials together, as with two matrices, but you can also multiply everything by an element of $k$. More concretely, $\mathbb{C}$ is an $\mathbb{R}$-algebra.

Some convenient properties of a $k$-algebra $R$ is that any quotient ring of $R$ must still be a $k$-algebra and any $R$-module must be a $k$ vector space. Furthermore, one has a rigid notion of dimension of a $k$-algebra (just the dimension of the underlying vector space) which can often be helpful. Unfortunately however, in many cases this dimension is infinite (even in $k[x]$ the dimension is infinite as a basis is the set of monomials $x^n$).
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top