MHB Kendra Leota's Calculus Questions @ Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving three calculus word problems involving optimization and area calculations. The first problem involves maximizing the area of two adjacent rectangular corrals using 200 ft of fencing, leading to dimensions of 50 ft by approximately 33.33 ft. The second problem requires finding the dimensions of a rectangle inscribed in a semicircle, with calculations yielding a specific x-value for an area of 30 square units. The third problem relates the distance a rocket travels to the angle of elevation from a camera, resulting in a calculated distance of approximately 109.19 ft when the angle is 20 degrees. Overall, the thread provides detailed solutions and methodologies for each calculus problem presented.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Calculus word problems?

1. A rancher has 200 ft of fencing with which to enclose two adjacent rectangular corrals, as shown. What dimensions should be used so that the enclosed area will be a maximum?

2.A rectangle is inscribed inside a semi-circle with intercepts at (-8,0), (0,8), and (8,0). Find a function that models the area of the rectangle in terms of half of the base, x, of the rectangle, as shown in the figure below. Determine what x-value will produce an area of 30 square units.

3. A camera is mounted at a point 300 ft from the base of a rocket launching pad. The rocket rises vertically when launched. Express the distance, x, traveled by the rocket as a function of the camera elevation angle, theta. Find the distance traveled by the rocket when the angle of elevation is 20 degrees.

PLEASE EXPLAIN

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kendra Leota,

1.) I would first draw a sketch of the corrals:

View attachment 1204

We can now see that we have the objective function (the enclosed area $A$):

$$A(x,y)=xy$$

subject to the constraint (the amount of fencing $F$):

$$2x+3y=F$$

I know of 3 methods to use here. The first two will require that we express $A$ as a function of 1 variable, so if we solve the constraint for $y$, we find:

$$y=\frac{F-2x}{3}$$

and by substitution we now have:

$$A(x)=x\left(\frac{F-2x}{3} \right)=\frac{1}{3}\left(x(F-2x) \right)$$

i) Pre-calculus technique:

We see that we have a parabolic function opening down, and so the vertex will be the global maximum. The vertex must be midway between the roots, and we can see the roots are at:

$$x=0,\,\frac{F}{2}$$

and so the axis of symmetry, which contains the vertex, is the line:

$$x=\frac{F}{4}$$

and thus:

$$y=\frac{F-2\left(\frac{F}{4} \right)}{3}=\frac{F}{6}$$

We then see that half of the fencing is in the horizontal segments and half is in the vertical segments.

ii) Using differentiation

Let's write the area function as:

$$A(x)=\frac{1}{3}\left(Fx-2x^2 \right)$$

Now, equate the first derivative to zero to find the critical point:

$$A'(x)=\frac{F}{3}-\frac{4}{3}x=0\implies x=\frac{F}{4}$$

$y$ is found in the same way as the first method. We see that:

$$A''(x)=-\frac{4}{3}<0$$

and so we know the function is concave down everywhere, so our critical value is a maximum.

iii) Multi-variable technique (Lagrange multipliers):

We obtain the following system:

$$y=2\lambda$$

$$x=3\lambda$$

This implies:

$$2x=3y$$

and putting this into the constraint, we find:

$$x=\frac{F}{4},\,y=\frac{F}{6}$$

To finish up, letting $$F=200\text{ ft}$$, we find the dimensions which maximize the enclosed area is:

$$x=50\text{ ft}$$

$$y=\frac{100}{3}\text{ ft}$$

2.) Let's draw a sketch:

View attachment 1205

We can see that we have the area of the rectangle as:

$$A(x,y)=2xy$$

Using the fact that $y$ is a function of $x$, we find:

$$A(x)=2x\sqrt{r^2-x^2}$$

Using the given $$r=8$$, we have:

$$A(x)=2x\sqrt{8^2-x^2}$$

To find the value of $x$ when $A=30$, we may write:

$$30=2x\sqrt{8^2-x^2}$$

Square both sides:

$$900=4x^2\left(64-x^2 \right)$$

$$225=x^2\left(64-x^2 \right)=64x^2-x^4$$

$$x^4-64x^2+225=0$$

Observing that we have a quadratic in $x^2$, we may apply the quadratic formula to obtain:

$$x^2=\frac{64\pm\sqrt{(-64)^2-4(1)(225)}}{2(1)}=32\pm\sqrt{799}$$

Hence, taking the positive root as we require $0\le x\le8$):

$$x=\sqrt{32\pm\sqrt{799}}$$

3.) Again, let's draw a sketch:

View attachment 1206

We now see that we may relate the two known sides of the triangle to the angle using the tangent function:

$$\tan(\theta)=\frac{x}{d}\implies x=d\tan(\theta)$$

Using the given $$d=300\text{ ft}$$ we have:

$$x(\theta)=300\tan(\theta)\text{ ft}$$

To find the distance traveled by the rocket when $\theta=20^{\circ}$, we may write:

$$x\left(20^{\circ} \right)=300\tan\left(20^{\circ} \right)\text{ ft}\approx109.191070279861\text{ ft}$$
 

Attachments

  • kendral1.jpg
    kendral1.jpg
    2.5 KB · Views: 92
  • kendral2.jpg
    kendral2.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 92
  • kendral3.jpg
    kendral3.jpg
    3.3 KB · Views: 104
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top