Kepler's 2nd across a system of planets

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tfr000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Kepler's 2nd Law states that a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times, but this does not imply that different planets, such as Pluto and Mercury, sweep out equal areas over the same time frame. The discussion clarifies that the law applies to individual planetary orbits rather than comparing different celestial bodies. The Areal velocity, which relates to angular momentum per unit mass, can be calculated using the formulas A = √{GMa} for circular orbits and A = √{GMa(1+e)/(1-e)} for elliptical orbits, where 'a' is the semi-major axis and 'e' is the eccentricity of the orbit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion
  • Basic knowledge of angular momentum in celestial mechanics
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics concepts such as semi-major axis and eccentricity
  • Mathematical skills for calculating Areal velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion
  • Learn how to calculate Areal velocity for various orbital shapes
  • Explore the effects of eccentricity on orbital dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between angular momentum and orbital characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of celestial mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of planetary motion and orbital mechanics.

tfr000
Messages
205
Reaction score
21
An interesting question, which I have just seen for the first time...
Does Kepler's 2nd mean that, for instance, both Pluto and Mercury sweep out an equal area over 1 hour? My gut reaction, without calculating anything, is "yes".
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Actually not.
The law is about one planetary orbit. It doesn't equate sweep-rates of different planets.
You could imagine a highly elliptical comet orbit with perihelion equal to Mercury's and aphelion equal to Plutos. (nearest and farthest points in orbit)

At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

So Pluto > Mercury.

Also think of the area sweep rate as expressing angular momentum of unit mass in the given orbit.
Pluto has more angular momentum (per unit mass)
 
Last edited:
This can be mathematically calculated as the Areal velocity for the object.
for circular orbits, this is found by:
A = \sqrt{GMa}

where a is the semi-major radius of the orbit (mean orbital distance)

for an elliptical orbit, it is found by:
\sqrt{GMa \frac{1+e}{1-e}}

Where e is the eccentricity of the orbit.

Note that as the mean orbital distance goes up, so does the Areal velocity (However, since it also goes up with eccentricity, it would be possible for an object with a high eccentricity to have a greater Areal velocity than a object with a higher mean orbital distance but a lower eccentricity.)
 
marcus said:
At farthest, the comet would be sweeping slower than Pluto, because destined to fall in towards Sun.
At nearest it would be sweeping faster than Mercury because destined to swing out away from Sun.
The comet's two rates would be equal (and slower than Pluto's but faster than Mercury's).

Yup, makes perfect sense.
 
Janus said:
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again. -- Alexander Pope
Indeed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K