Kepler's 3rd Law: Solving Questions & Math

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mh8780
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler's law Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Kepler's 3rd Law, focusing on the mathematical application of the law in the context of celestial mechanics. Participants explore calculations involving the masses of celestial bodies and their orbital periods, addressing potential errors and unit consistency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether mass (M) must be expressed in solar masses when applying Kepler's 3rd Law.
  • Another participant suggests that while SI units can be used, the resulting period will not be in years unless specific unit conversions are applied.
  • There is a discussion about the correct formulation of Kepler's 3rd Law, with one participant asserting that the original equation presented is incorrect.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of using consistent units in calculations to avoid confusion.
  • A different approach is proposed, where the masses of the planets are considered negligible, leading to a derived equation for calculating orbital time directly.
  • Using the provided data, one participant calculates an orbital period of approximately 1.794 years, contrasting with the earlier calculation of 1.95 years.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct application of Kepler's 3rd Law, particularly regarding the treatment of masses and the use of units. There is no consensus on the correct approach or final calculations, as multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in unit usage and the implications of different formulations of Kepler's 3rd Law. Some calculations appear to have discrepancies, but the reasons for these differences are not resolved.

mh8780
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello I am studying astro independently and have a question on keplers 3rd law and my math.
I set myself with a few givens with Kepler's laws
My first question is, I remember reading M had to be in solar masses, is this true?
For p^2=4π^2/G(M1+M2)/ a^3
Given: a= 1 AU

m1= .31 M☉(Used Gliese 581)
m2= .00095 M☉ (Used Jupiter)
We all know the gravitational constant is 6.67*10^-11
I plug in everything and get

39.47/6.67*10^-11(.31+.00095) *1^3

39.47/6.67*10^-11(.31095) *1^3

39.47/11.44031908×10^12
This is where I always screw up. In my notes I got 10.31065 I don't know how but after this I did:
39.47/10.31065
3.828
√p^2=√3.828
p=1.95 Years

Otherwise I would have got 12000132.94Also when do I use p^2=a^3/(M1+M2) ?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1) You can use SI units but then the period will not be in years of course.
2) Your equation for Kepler's third law is wrong.
 
mh8780 said:
Hello I am studying astro independently and have a question on keplers 3rd law and my math.
I set myself with a few givens with Kepler's laws
My first question is, I remember reading M had to be in solar masses, is this true?

Not unless you use G expressed in solar masses and 'a' expressed in AUs. Look up the units associated with the value of G in your calculations, and use consistent units accordingly for the other quantities in the formula.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6

For p^2=4π^2/G(M1+M2)/ a^3
Given: a= 1 AU

m1= .31 M☉(Used Gliese 581)
m2= .00095 M☉ (Used Jupiter)
We all know the gravitational constant is 6.67*10^-11
I plug in everything and get

39.47/6.67*10^-11(.31+.00095) *1^3

39.47/6.67*10^-11(.31095) *1^3

39.47/11.44031908×10^12
This is where I always screw up. In my notes I got 10.31065 I don't know how but after this I did:
39.47/10.31065
3.828
√p^2=√3.828
p=1.95 Years

Otherwise I would have got 12000132.94Also when do I use p^2=a^3/(M1+M2) ?

It's always a good idea to show units in your calculations. It avoids a lot of confusion in figuring out what your calculation means.
 
Keplers rule disregards the planet masses, the k value being the same for all (negligable mass) planets.
k = p ² / a ³
No good in this case.
You have given both masses and the distance inbetween.
Ive attached the two body data sheet to follow, finding the orbit time for either body (which is the same for both)
can be found.

The derived equation for finding t directly is more involved :

t = square root ( ( 4 * π² * ( M2 / ( M1 + M2 ) ) * d³ ) / ( G * M2 ) )
or
t = square root ( ( 4 * π² * ( M1 / ( M1 + M2 ) ) * d³ ) / ( G * M1 ) )

Using your data, i get :
t = 1.794 years
 

Attachments

  • p016.jpg
    p016.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 518

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K