Keplers laws and a hypothetical 1/r^3 dependence (1 Viewer)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

i've been asked a hypothetical question about Keplers three laws: What if the gravitational force was proprotional to 1/r^3 instead of 1/r^2? And for one of the laws it apparently "isent easy to decide". My thoughts:

keplers 1. : my first thought was that this law was the "not easy to decide"
keplers 2. : must still be valid, because the vector product r x F will always be zero, and hence dL/dt = 0 (conservation of momentum for any central force)
keplers 3 : a planets period would change?

Is this correct? And can somebody help me clearify matters?

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving