Keplers Third Law: Showing T^2 ∝ R^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter skiing4free
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Third law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving Kepler's Third Law, which states that the square of the orbital period (T) of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis (R) of its orbit. The key equations involved are the gravitational force equation, F = GMm/r², and the centripetal force equation, F = (m4π²r)/T². By equating these two forces and simplifying, the relationship r³ ∝ T² is established, confirming Kepler's Law through mathematical derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force (F = GMm/r²)
  • Knowledge of centripetal force and circular motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of orbital mechanics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Kepler's Laws in classical mechanics
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its implications
  • Explore the concept of angular velocity in circular motion
  • Investigate the applications of Kepler's Laws in modern astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astronomers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of orbital mechanics and gravitational interactions in celestial bodies.

skiing4free
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By considering the centripetal force which acts on a planet in a cirlar orbit, show that T^2\proptoR^3, where T is the time taken for one orbitaround the Sun and R is the radius of the orbit.


Homework Equations


Fc=GMm/r^2
1/2Mv^2=GMm/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I showed that F\propto1/d^2 but then could not incorporate R^3 into the equation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you made it clear that you know that the gravitational force IS the centripetal force on the planet, and you have the expression for the gravitational force. What is the formula for the centripetal force on an object? Equate these two formulas.
 
skiing4free said:
1/2Mv^2=GMm/r^2

This equation isn't even dimensionally correct,
and KE <> PE.
 
davieddy said:
This equation isn't even dimensionally correct,
and KE <> PE.

Thats exactly what i showed, Ek=Epg. (<>, that doesn't make sense?)
 
skiing4free said:
Thats exactly what i showed, Ek=Epg. (<>, that doesn't make sense?)

<> means NOT equal to.
Anyway potential energy is -GMm/r.

Even if you had erroneously said KE= PE you could have deduced
T^2 proportional to r^3.
 
as was previously said just equate the expressions for the gravitational force and the centripetal force GMm/r^2=m(v^2)/r and play with it a bit then use some basic formulas for circular motion for angular velocity and time period and you will get the expression for T and R with some constants in it. Where did you find this : 1/2Mv^2=GMm/r^2 ?
 
Sorry i got really confused with the energy equations this is what i meant to write;

F=(m4\pi^2 r)/T^2

F=GMm/r^2

so

(m4\pi^2 r)/T^2=GMm/r^2

m cancels, left with 4\pi^2 r^3=GMT^2

\Rightarrow r^3\proptoT^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K