Kicking a Ball: Solving for Height, Time, & Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter maiamorbific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Height Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
maiamorbific
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Girl kicks ball straight up, makes contact with ball 1 m above ground, initial velocity = 3 m/s
a.) How high does the ball go?
b.) How long until it hits the ground?
c.) If she had given it an initial x-component of velocity of 2 m/s (same y-component), how far would the ball land from her?
d.) With what velocity would it hit the ground?

Homework Equations


vf2 = vi2 + 2ay(yf-yi)
vf = vi + at
xf = xi + vit + 1/2axt2

The Attempt at a Solution


a.) vf2 = vi2 + 2ay(yf-yi)
0 = 32 + 2(9.8)(yf - 1)
-9 = 19.6yf - 19.6
10.6/19.6 = yf
yf = 0.5408 m
This seems like a really small number; shouldn't it be higher?

b.) vf = vi + at
0 = vi + -gt
t = vi/g
t = 3/9.8 = 0.306 s
0.306 s * 2 = 0.612 s (because the flight curve is symmetric)

I'm not really sure what equations to use for parts c and d, neither am I sure if parts a and b are correct.
Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) check your convention is gravity positive or negative?

b) you need to think about where she initially kicked it from and whether time up == time down for entire trip or just for the symmetric part.

c) What do you need to know about the ball to determine how far it traveled given no air resistance?
hint: it's none of those equations, it's simpler than that.
 
Thank you for your help so far.

a.) Changing a to -9.8 gives a final y-position of 2.837 m.
b.) Using the eqn. yf = yi + vit + 1/2at2 makes more sense because it takes into account the non-zero starting position of 1 m.
Therefore, t = 1.174 s
question:
Do I have to multiply this answer by 2? (I don't think so, because doesn't the quadratic equation represent the entire parabola of the flight curve?)

question:
c.) I don't know what you mean by not having to use any eqn.
I used xf = xi + vit + 1/2at2
xf = 1 + 2(1.174) + 0 (since no a in x-direction)
xf = 3.348 m
Is this not correct?

question:
d.) Would vf = vi because there no acceleration in x-direction?
Would the answer be 2 m/s?
 
for c I was thinking of even more simply: d = v*t, which is just a simplified version of the one you used.

d) you still need to take y velocity into account here...