MHB Kim's Questions on Babylonian Method for Estimating Square Roots

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Babylonian method for estimating square roots, providing detailed calculations for specific examples. For square root 130, starting with an initial guess of 11.5, the estimate converges to approximately 11.4017542509914 after several iterations. For square root 115, using 10.7262 as a guess yields an estimate of about 10.7238055620816. Nails' estimate for square root 58, starting at 7.8, results in approximately 7.6179487 after one iteration. Lastly, estimating square root 75 from an initial guess of 8 gives a next estimate of 8.6875.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Can someone please help me everytime I turn these in I get them wrong.?

1.Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

2. Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

3. Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

4. If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Kim's questions at Yahoo! Answers regarding thethe Babylonian method for estimating square roots

Hello Kim,

The Babylonian method for approximating square roots is the recursive method given by:

Given:

$$x_0\approx\sqrt{k}$$

Then:

$$x_{n+1}=\frac{x_n^2+k}{2x_n}$$

where $k$ is the number for which we are approximating the square root.

So, armed with this formula, let's now answer the given questions:

1.) Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

We will use 15 digits of precision here since it is not stated how many iterations to carry out:

$$x_0=11.5$$

$$x_1\approx11.4021739130435$$

$$x_2\approx11.4017542587143$$

$$x_3\approx11.4017542509914$$

$$x_4\approx11.4017542509914$$

Thus, with 15 digits of accuracy, we may state:

$$\sqrt{130}\approx11.4017542509914$$

2.) Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

The next result here is approximately:

$$x_1=\frac{10.7262^2+115}{2\cdot10.7262}\approx10.7238055620816$$3.) Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{7.8^2+58}{2\cdot7.8}=7.6\overline{179487}$$

4.) If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{8^2+75}{2\cdot8}=8.6875$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top