MHB Kim's Questions on Babylonian Method for Estimating Square Roots

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Can someone please help me everytime I turn these in I get them wrong.?

1.Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

2. Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

3. Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

4. If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Kim's questions at Yahoo! Answers regarding thethe Babylonian method for estimating square roots

Hello Kim,

The Babylonian method for approximating square roots is the recursive method given by:

Given:

$$x_0\approx\sqrt{k}$$

Then:

$$x_{n+1}=\frac{x_n^2+k}{2x_n}$$

where $k$ is the number for which we are approximating the square root.

So, armed with this formula, let's now answer the given questions:

1.) Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

We will use 15 digits of precision here since it is not stated how many iterations to carry out:

$$x_0=11.5$$

$$x_1\approx11.4021739130435$$

$$x_2\approx11.4017542587143$$

$$x_3\approx11.4017542509914$$

$$x_4\approx11.4017542509914$$

Thus, with 15 digits of accuracy, we may state:

$$\sqrt{130}\approx11.4017542509914$$

2.) Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

The next result here is approximately:

$$x_1=\frac{10.7262^2+115}{2\cdot10.7262}\approx10.7238055620816$$3.) Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{7.8^2+58}{2\cdot7.8}=7.6\overline{179487}$$

4.) If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{8^2+75}{2\cdot8}=8.6875$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top