MHB Kim's Questions on Babylonian Method for Estimating Square Roots

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Babylonian method for estimating square roots, providing detailed calculations for specific examples. For square root 130, starting with an initial guess of 11.5, the estimate converges to approximately 11.4017542509914 after several iterations. For square root 115, using 10.7262 as a guess yields an estimate of about 10.7238055620816. Nails' estimate for square root 58, starting at 7.8, results in approximately 7.6179487 after one iteration. Lastly, estimating square root 75 from an initial guess of 8 gives a next estimate of 8.6875.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Can someone please help me everytime I turn these in I get them wrong.?

1.Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

2. Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

3. Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

4. If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Kim's questions at Yahoo! Answers regarding thethe Babylonian method for estimating square roots

Hello Kim,

The Babylonian method for approximating square roots is the recursive method given by:

Given:

$$x_0\approx\sqrt{k}$$

Then:

$$x_{n+1}=\frac{x_n^2+k}{2x_n}$$

where $k$ is the number for which we are approximating the square root.

So, armed with this formula, let's now answer the given questions:

1.) Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

We will use 15 digits of precision here since it is not stated how many iterations to carry out:

$$x_0=11.5$$

$$x_1\approx11.4021739130435$$

$$x_2\approx11.4017542587143$$

$$x_3\approx11.4017542509914$$

$$x_4\approx11.4017542509914$$

Thus, with 15 digits of accuracy, we may state:

$$\sqrt{130}\approx11.4017542509914$$

2.) Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

The next result here is approximately:

$$x_1=\frac{10.7262^2+115}{2\cdot10.7262}\approx10.7238055620816$$3.) Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{7.8^2+58}{2\cdot7.8}=7.6\overline{179487}$$

4.) If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{8^2+75}{2\cdot8}=8.6875$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top