Kinematics Equations: Solve for Stone's Velocity & Time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around kinematics, specifically focusing on the motion of a stone catapulted vertically upwards and the time it takes for it to hit the ground. The original poster presents a problem involving initial velocity, acceleration due to gravity, and the height from which the stone is launched.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest breaking the problem into two parts: the ascent to maximum height and the descent to the ground. There are inquiries about which kinematic equations to apply and how to interpret the results from quadratic equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using standard kinematic equations and forming intuitive estimates for time. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the quadratic solutions and the interpretation of the results in relation to the problem's context.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the direction of the coordinate system, with some participants noting that the convention of upward as positive may differ from the original poster's approach. Additionally, there are references to textbook answers that do not align with the calculations presented, prompting further examination of the problem setup.

CathyLou
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
Hi.

Could someone please help me with the following M1 level Maths question. I would really appreciate any help as I am pretty stuck at the moment.

A stone is catapulted vertically upwards with a velocity of 25 m/s from a point 2 m above the ground. Find (a) its velocity when it hits the ground (b) the time it takes the reach the ground.

I took the upwards direction to be positive.

u = 25

a = -9.8

v = ?

I did not know where to go from there.

Thank you.

Cathy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do it in two parts. From 2m above the ground to the max. height, then from the max. height to the ground.
 
neutrino said:
Do it in two parts. From 2m above the ground to the max. height, then from the max. height to the ground.

Thanks for replying.

Could you please tell me which equation to use?

Thank you.

Cathy
 
Nothing special...it's the usual equations of kinematics.
 
First, form an intuitive guess to compare your answer too. With an initial velocity of 25 m/s up, it will take roughly 2.5 seconds for it to slow to 0, since gravity will slow it 10 meters per second every second. This is symmetrical on the way down. So 5 seconds later it will be back at the 2 meters above the ground, but traveling 25 meters per second towards the ground. It will only take a fraction of a second to travel the remaining 2 meters to the ground, especially because it already had a 25 m/s head start.

vf=vi+0.5at2
yf=yi+vit+0.5at2
yf=sqrt(yi+2a delta y)

You should be able to use these formulas and use algebra to re-write them into any form you need. Try to isolate the unknown variable on one side of the equation, while having all known variables on the other side. Or you could re-write it as a 2nd degree polynomial set to 0 and use the quadratic equation, which gives you 2 answers. Sometimes this is useful, and sometimes you just need to discard one of the answers.
 
Okay.

Could someone please help me with this one too?

A particle is projected upwards with a speed of 14 m/s. Find for how long it is above 2 m.

I got that:
u = 14
a = -9.8
s = 2
t = ?

Using s = ut + 1/2at^2 I got that 4.9t^2 - 14t + 2 = 0.

Using the quadratic formula I got that t = 2.71 s or 0.15 s (to 3 s. f.) but the answer in the back of the textbook is 2.56 s. Could someone please tell me where I have gone wrong?

Thank you.

Cathy
 
tony873004 said:
First, form an intuitive guess to compare your answer too. With an initial velocity of 25 m/s up, it will take roughly 2.5 seconds for it to slow to 0, since gravity will slow it 10 meters per second every second. This is symmetrical on the way down. So 5 seconds later it will be back at the 2 meters above the ground, but traveling 25 meters per second towards the ground. It will only take a fraction of a second to travel the remaining 2 meters to the ground, especially because it already had a 25 m/s head start.

vf=vi+0.5at2
yf=yi+vit+0.5at2
yf=sqrt(yi+2a delta y)

You should be able to use these formulas and use algebra to re-write them into any form you need. Try to isolate the unknown variable on one side of the equation, while having all known variables on the other side. Or you could re-write it as a 2nd degree polynomial set to 0 and use the quadratic equation, which gives you 2 answers. Sometimes this is useful, and sometimes you just need to discard one of the answers.

Thanks so much for your help!

Cathy
 
CathyLou said:
Okay.

Could someone please help me with this one too?

A particle is projected upwards with a speed of 14 m/s. Find for how long it is above 2 m.

I got that:
u = 14
a = -9.8
s = 2
t = ?

Using s = ut + 1/2at^2 I got that 4.9t^2 - 14t + 2 = 0.

Using the quadratic formula I got that t = 2.71 s or 0.15 s (to 3 s. f.) but the answer in the back of the textbook is 2.56 s. Could someone please tell me where I have gone wrong?

Thank you.

Cathy

You did it right. You just didn't interpret your answers from the quadratic properly. This object will be 2 feet above the ground twice: once on the way up, and once on the way down. 2.71 and 0.15 are the times it will cross the 2 ft mark. It will spend its first 0.15 seconds below 2 feet, and it will remain above 2 feet until 2.71 seconds after launch. After 2.71 seconds it will spend another 0.15 seconds dropping from 2 feet back to the ground. Just subtract your 2 quadratic answers and you'll have the answer from the back of the book. Draw a picture, tracing the path of this object, and mark the 2 foot level. Put 0.15s next to the 2 foot level on the upward part of the trajectory and 2.71s on the 2 foot level on the downward part of your trajectory.

You also seem to be going against standard practice in these problems by the direction of your y-axis. Usually up is regarded as positive. Your quadratic of "4.9t^2 - 14t + 2 = 0." implies that up is negative. You could re-write it as - 4.9t^2, since gravity pulls down, + 14t since your initial velocity is 14 m/s up, -2 since 2 is your initial position minus your final position (0-2=-2). Since you were consistent with up = negative you got the right answer. And it's not wrong to do it this way. Either way is right,but you have to choose one or the other, and most consider up to be positive. So for the sake of consistency, your teacher in your lectures probably considers up to be positive, so you should too. But ask the teacher.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K