Kinetic energy of quarks in a baryon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The kinetic energy of a proton is not simply the sum of the kinetic energies of its constituent quarks. While a proton may be described as having a kinetic energy of 50 GeV, this figure does not translate directly to each of the three quarks having approximately 17 GeV of energy. Instead, the energy distribution among quarks is characterized by parton distribution functions, which detail the probability of finding a quark with a fraction x of the total energy. Additionally, the total mass-energy of a proton in equilibrium is typically less than 1 GeV, and the concept of kinetic energy is frame-dependent, particularly in high-energy collision scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parton distribution functions in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of mass-energy equivalence
  • Knowledge of quark-gluon interactions within baryons
  • Basic principles of high-energy particle collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of parton distribution functions
  • Explore the implications of mass-energy equivalence in particle physics
  • Investigate the role of gluons in the energy dynamics of protons
  • Learn about the effects of frame of reference in high-energy particle collisions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in quantum chromodynamics, and students studying high-energy physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the energy dynamics of baryons and quark interactions.

ValeForce46
Messages
40
Reaction score
3
If we say that a proton has a kinetic energy of ##50## GeV, can we say that each of the three quarks that compose it have roughly a mean energy of ##\approx\frac{50}{3}=17## GeV?

If not, what can we say about the energy of each individual quark inside a baryon with a known energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, ohwilleke, mfb and 3 others
Orodruin said:
This is usually described by the parton distribution functions that essentially describe the probability distribution of finding a particular quark (or gluon) with a fraction x of the total energy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parton_(particle_physics)#Parton_distribution_functions
For clarity, it is worth observing that the parton distribution function is largely a function of intra-proton quarks and gluons within the proton system. It is not meaningfully dependent upon the velocity of the proton system (together with the particle impacting it in a collision) as a whole relative to the world outside the proton.

By virtue of the equivalence of mass and energy, the total mass and energy of a proton (adding up all possible parton distribution function possible outputs), including internal kinetic energy and gluon field energy and the mass of its quarks arising from their Higgs field interactions, add up to the total mass of the proton when the proton is in equilibrium. High energy collisions involve particles, such as two protons, colliding at high energies relative to each other, without regard to their kinetic energies in a frame of reference that is relative to the world outside of the colliding particle system.

Also, gluons, in principle, since they are massless, don't have kinetic energy. Each gluon, in principle, has a well defined energy which is a function of its frequency, much like a photon, but not kinetic energy. Only quarks and other fermions and W and Z bosons and Higgs bosons in the parton distribution function have kinetic energy because only that have mass.

So, saying that a proton has 50 GeV of kinetic energy is an ill-defined statement until you choose a suitable frame of reference.

Protons in equilibrium never have 50 GeV of kinetic energy in their own internal frame of reference (e.g. relative to their center of mass or electromagnetic charge). The total mass-energy inside a proton system in equilibrium is a hair less than 1 GeV in most circumstances (although the effective total is partially a function of the energy transfer in the collision due to renormalization but that only varies very slowly, roughly speaking, as a log of energy transfer scale that gets smaller at higher energy transfer of collision scales).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
966
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K