Kinetic energy of the photoelectrons

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of photoelectrons generated when ultraviolet light of 200 nm wavelength strikes a metal with a work function of 3.0 eV, while the metal is also subjected to a +1.0 V potential. Participants are exploring how to incorporate the effect of the applied voltage into the calculation of kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the maximum kinetic energy using the formula Kmax = hf - phi but expresses uncertainty regarding the implications of the +1.0 V potential. Other participants question how to modify the kinetic energy calculation to account for this potential.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on considering the effect of the applied potential on the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons. Multiple interpretations of how to adjust the calculations are being explored, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the applied voltage in the context of the photoelectric effect, with some uncertainty about how it modifies the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons.

manaXmizery
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of ultraviolet light with wavelength of 200 nm is incident on a metal whose work function is 3.0 eV. Note that this metal is applied with +1.0 V with respect to the ground. Determine the largest kinetic energy of the photoelectrons generated in this process.

Homework Equations


Kmax = hf - phi

Kmax = q*|V|

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not entirely sure what the statement about the +1.0 V implies and hence I simply used the formula
Kmax = hf - phi . Substituting the appropriate values gives Kmax = 5.139*10^-19 J . Am I on the correct path ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the result in the absence of the applied potential. You must now modify the kinetic energy to take into account the potential.
 
DrClaude said:
You got the result in the absence of the applied potential. You must now modify the kinetic energy to take into account the potential.
how do you take into account the potential?
 
whatphysics said:
how do you take into account the potential?
By calculating its effect on the released photoelectron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K