Kinimatics: Find a & b for Projected Particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14
I have gotten the right ans for this question, but I am not too sure if I am worked it out the right way.

Question: A particle is projected vertically upwards from a point O with speed [itex]u ms^{-1}[/itex]. Two seconds later it is still moving upwards with a speed [itex]\frac{1}{3}u ms^{-1}[/itex]. Find a: the value of u, b: the time from instant that the particle leaves O to the instant that it returns to O.

I worked out U which is 29.4ms^-1.

It b: I am having trouble with, as I stated I have the right ans, but to sure on if I have gotten the ans correctly.

What I have done it is take the part where the ball is at 1/3 u and workout out the time of travel from the part where it passes 1/3u again and the add on 4 seconds. Not very good at explain hopefully the math will show better.

[itex]0=9.8t-4.9t^2 → 4.9t^2-9.8t=0[/itex] solve and t=0 and t=2. So I then add on the 4sec and total time is 6 secs. Is this correct or not?

I would appreciate any help, big thanks in advance.

Sorry for the repost, the first one keeps telling me its invalid I can't edit it at all. So could one of the mods remove my older post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taylor_1989 said:
[itex]0=9.8t-4.9t^2 → 4.9t^2-9.8t=0[/itex] solve and t=0 and t=2. So I then add on the 4sec and total time is 6 secs. Is this correct or not?
Please explain where this equation comes from. Where did you get a velocity of 9.8?

Why not deal directly with velocity equations? Much simpler.
 
I got it from the 1/3*29.4. I didn't know that I could deal with directly as there are two different velocity, for the way up. That is why I broke it down.
 
Taylor_1989 said:
I got it from the 1/3*29.4.
But that kind of assumes the answer, doesn't it?

I didn't know that I could deal with directly as there are two different velocity, for the way up. That is why I broke it down.
Just use vf = vi - gt .
 
Okay I am with you. Thanks for the help.