Is my Koopmans theorem calculation for molecule A reasonable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter greisen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Koopmans theorem to estimate excitation energy for molecule A. The user calculated the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies for molecule A, A-, and A+. The computed energy gap (Egap) is 1 eV smaller than the experimental value, raising questions about the accuracy of the calculation. The context of the calculation is specified as being in the gas phase.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Koopmans theorem
  • Knowledge of molecular orbital theory
  • Familiarity with energy gap calculations
  • Experience with gas phase molecular systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the limitations of Koopmans theorem in excited state calculations
  • Explore methods to improve excitation energy predictions
  • Learn about computational chemistry software for molecular orbital calculations
  • Investigate experimental techniques for measuring excitation energies in gas phase
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, computational chemists, and researchers involved in molecular modeling and excitation energy calculations will benefit from this discussion.

greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am using Koopmans theorem trying to estimate excitation energy so I have calculated the homo/lumo for molecule A as well as for A- and A+(adding and removing an electron respectively). Then I would use the formula

Egap = min[(E(n+1)-E(n)]-[E(n)-E(n-1)]]

I get a energy gap which is smaller than the experimental value(1 eV less) does this seem like a reasonable computation?

Any advise appreciated - thanks in advance

Best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this gas phase or solid phase?
 
it is in gas phase
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K