Kruskal-Szekeres Radius: Explained for Beginners in GR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smoothoperator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Kruskal-Szekeres (K-S) coordinates in General Relativity (GR) and their relationship to the Schwarzschild metric. It clarifies that the K-S metric is not an alternative metric but rather a different coordinate system for the same manifold, maintaining the same physical properties. The proper distance between two points remains invariant across different coordinate systems, as demonstrated by the integral formula for proper distance, which relies on the metric tensor components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with the Schwarzschild metric
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems in differential geometry
  • Basic proficiency in tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Schwarzschild metric in detail
  • Learn about the implications of coordinate transformations in GR
  • Explore the concept of proper distance in curved spacetime
  • Investigate other coordinate systems used in GR, such as Rindler and Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and enthusiasts of General Relativity, physicists exploring gravitational theories, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spacetime metrics.

smoothoperator
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm a beginner in GR (as you may conclude from some of my previous posts) so any help is greatly appreciated.

I was recently studying alternative metrics for the Schwarzschild metric and one of them was the Kruskal Szekeres metric.

In Schwarzschild, the radius r is defined which is the radius from the centre of the object with mass we are sutdying. In K-S metric the Tortoise coordinate was mentioned with a value greater than the classical r in Schwarzschild.

So my question is, if we use a different metric, in this case the K-S metric, does the radial spatial distance between two points change? And can anybody give me a concrete example, for instance a distance of 1m near Earth would be what distance according to Kruskal and Szekeres coordinates?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kruskal-Szekeres is not an alternative metric, it is a different coordinate system of the same manifold with the same metric. In the overlapping regions, the KS coordinates describe the very same physical situation. Just like you can use polar coordinates in ##\mathbb R^2## without changing the fact that you are describing ##\mathbb R^2##.
 
Proper distances, being proper, do not depend on the particular coordinate system you choose. If you chose 1 path, parametrized by ##\lambda##, between two points ##1,2##, the proper distance between them is given by $$s=\int_1^2 \sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}}d\lambda$$ You should verify for yourself that a change of coordinates changes ##g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow g_{\mu'\nu'}## and ##x^\mu(\lambda)\rightarrow x^{\mu'}(\lambda)## but does not change ##s##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K