L^p space related question for p= infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter smanalysis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the separability of L^p spaces, specifically L^infinity, in relation to measurable sets. It is established that L^infinity[a,b] is not separable if the set E contains a nondegenerate interval. The participants suggest that L^infinity(Q) may be separable, but there is contention regarding its separability, with a recommendation to utilize a Cantor diagonal argument to demonstrate its non-separability. Additionally, a simpler approach using L^infinity({0}) is proposed for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L^p spaces, particularly L^infinity
  • Familiarity with concepts of separability in normed linear spaces
  • Knowledge of measurable sets and intervals in real analysis
  • Basic understanding of Cantor's diagonal argument
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of L^infinity spaces and their separability
  • Study the Cantor diagonal argument and its applications in real analysis
  • Explore embeddings of L^infinity spaces and their implications
  • Examine examples of measurable sets and their impact on separability
USEFUL FOR

Real analysts, mathematicians studying functional analysis, and students tackling problems related to L^p spaces and separability concepts.

smanalysis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are asked to exhibit a measurable set E such that L^p(E) is separable for p= infinity. Also, we have to show that L^infinity(E) is not separable if E contains a nondegenerate interval.

Homework Equations


A normed linear space X is separable provided there is a countable subset that is dense in X.
In my real analysis class, we showed that L^infinity[a,b] is not separable but then my professor said that L^infinity of a countable set will be separable.

The Attempt at a Solution


Going by what my professor said, I'm thinking that L^infinity(Q) would work here, but I'm having a little trouble starting out on how to show that this is separable. Any ideas? I would really appreciate some help here. For the second part of the problem, I think it just follows from the fact that L^infinity[a,b] is not separable, but I'm struggling to figure out why. Well, wouldn't [a,b] itself consist of disjoint sets of nondegenerate intervals? Then again, maybe this question is related to something different...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
smanalysis said:
Going by what my professor said, I'm thinking that L^infinity(Q) would work here, but I'm having a little trouble starting out on how to show that this is separable. Any ideas?

OK, you COULD proceed this way, but you're making it hard on yourself. What about L^\infty(\{0\}), so simply take a singleton. Isn't that a lot easier??

I would really appreciate some help here. For the second part of the problem, I think it just follows from the fact that L^infinity[a,b] is not separable, but I'm struggling to figure out why.

Let's fix some notations, let E be our set that contains the nondegenerate interval [a,b]. You could begin by showing that there exists an embedding L^\infty([a,b])\rightarrow L^\infty(E).

Well, wouldn't [a,b] itself consist of disjoint sets of nondegenerate intervals?

Yes, of course, but I don't see how this would help you...
 
I would listen to micromass' advice. Especially since I don't think L^infinity(Q) is separable. Why don't you try to show that it isn't? It's a pretty simple Cantor diagonal type argument.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
707
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K