Ladder Operator for Harmonic Oscillator: a|0> = |0>

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the action of the annihilation operator (denoted as a) on the ground state of a harmonic oscillator (|0⟩). Participants explore whether the result of applying the operator yields the number zero or the zero ket, and the implications of these interpretations within the framework of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a|0⟩ equals the number zero, suggesting that if a were the identity operator, the result would be |0⟩.
  • Others argue that a|0⟩ results in the zero ket, distinguishing it from the ground state |0⟩.
  • There is a clarification that the zero ket is the zero vector in the state space, while |0⟩ is not the zero vector but has a specific eigenvalue.
  • Some participants emphasize that all physical states must be normalizable, referencing the normalization condition <0|0> = 1.
  • A question is raised about the action of the number operator \hat{N} on |0⟩, with some suggesting it should yield the null vector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the outcome of applying the annihilation operator to the ground state, with no consensus reached on whether it results in the number zero or the zero ket. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the operators in question are not hermitian, which raises questions about their physical relevance. The distinction between the zero ket and the ground state |0⟩ is also emphasized, indicating a nuanced understanding of the mathematical framework involved.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
For harmonic oscillator, let |0> be the ground state, so which statement is correct?

a|0> =|0>

or

a|0> = 0 (number)

where a is the destroy operator
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the number zero. If a were the identity operator, you would get |0> back.
 
clem said:
It is the number zero. If a were the identity operator, you would get |0> back.

you sure about that? i know that the books say zero but those operators aren't hermitian anyway hence unphysical so what does it matter what it does to |0> ?
 
Neither. [tex]a|0\rangle =[/tex] the zero ket.

EDIT: The zero ket and [tex]|0\rangle[/tex] are different things.
 
Last edited:
dx said:
Neither. [tex]a|0\rangle =[/tex] the zero ket.

zero ket? Do you mean [tex]a|0\rangle = |0\rangle[/tex] ?
 
No. The zero ket is the zero vector in the state space. [tex]|0\rangle[/tex] is not the zero vector, it's just the vector with eigenvalue [itex]\hbar \omega ( 0 + \frac{1}{2})[/itex].
 
dx said:
No. The zero ket is the zero vector in the state space. [tex]|0\rangle[/tex] is not the zero vector, it's just the vector with eigenvalue [itex]\hbar \omega ( 0 + \frac{1}{2})[/itex].

Oh, got it :)
 
Or better yet, a|0> = null vector.
 
Yes. The thing to remember is that all physical states must be normalizable. So

<0|0> = 1
 
  • #10
and what about [tex]\hat{N}|0\rangle[/tex], where [tex]\hat{N}=\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a}[/tex] is the number operator? Should it be

[tex]\hat{N}|0\rangle = 0|0\rangle = 0[/tex] (number) ?
 
  • #11
KFC said:
and what about [tex]\hat{N}|0\rangle[/tex], where [tex]\hat{N}=\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a}[/tex] is the number operator? Should it be

[tex]\hat{N}|0\rangle = 0|0\rangle = 0[/tex] (number) ?

Technically speaking, it is the null vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K