Ladder operators for angular momentum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of expectation values and ladder operators, specifically the angular momentum ladder operator L+. Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual aspects of these operators within quantum mechanics, including their implications for state transitions and orthogonality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the expectation value of the ladder operator L+, questioning its definition and relationship to the state |l,m⟩.
  • Another participant states that the expectation value of L+ is zero unless the state is a mixture, implying that L+ transitions states.
  • A participant seeks a proof for why the expectation value of L+ is zero, indicating a desire for a deeper understanding of the mathematical setup.
  • It is noted that applying L+ to the state |l,m⟩ results in the state |l,m+1⟩, which is orthogonal to |l,m⟩.
  • One participant clarifies that the expectation value of an operator is related to the average value from repeated measurements, emphasizing that L+ is not Hermitian and thus its expectation value does not represent a physical average.
  • The same participant reiterates that the expectation value vanishes due to the orthogonality of the states involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the expectation value of L+ is zero for the state |l,m⟩, but there is no consensus on the detailed proof or the implications of this result. The discussion includes varying levels of understanding regarding the mathematical formalism and conceptual interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the mathematical proof of the expectation value being zero and the implications of L+ not being Hermitian. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the orthogonality of quantum states.

Tvdmeer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This might be a basic question, but I'm having some difficulty understanding expectation values and ladder operators for angular momentum.

<L+> = ?

I know that L+ = Lx+iLy, but I don't know what the expectation value would be?

Someone told me something that looked like this:

<lml|L+|lml>=<lml|lml+1

But I don't really get how that works, nor do I know if that is the same as <L+>.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since L+ changes one state to another, its expectation value is zero unless the state is a mixture.
 
Thanks for getting back to me. I understand conceptually why the expectation value of L+ is equal to zero. I guess I'm more asking what the proof is for that. Obviously since it is just an operator it will have a zero likelihood of being anywhere, but I just don't know why in this equation my teacher new to sandwich l+ with lms on either side:

<lml|L+|lml>

I just don't understand the setup
 
L+|l,m> gives |l,m+1>, which iis orthogonal to |l,m>.
 
If a system is in the state [tex]\left|\psi\right>[/tex], the expectation value of an Hermitian operator [tex]A[/tex] is given by

[tex]\left<\psi\right|A\left|\psi\right>[/tex]

This has nothing to do with an operator "being anywhere," but rather with the average value you would see if you performed an experiment many times and measured the physical quantity represented by the operator [tex]A[/tex].

Of course the operator [tex]L_+[/tex] is NOT Hermitian, and the interpretation of its expectation value as an expected average over many experimental trials is nonsense. In this particular case, the expectation value vanishes for the reason already mentioned, namely

[tex]L_+ \left|l,m_l\right> \propto \left|l,m_l +1 \right>[/tex]

and the states [tex]\left|l,m_l\right>[/tex] are orthonormal, i.e. [tex]\left<l,m_l\right|k,n_k\left> = \delta_{l,k} \delta_{m_l,n_k}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K