Quantum Landau vs Griffith QM textbook

AI Thread Summary
When considering a course in quantum mechanics that utilizes Landau's books, it's important to assess the level of difficulty. Landau's texts are regarded as more advanced than Griffiths, which may indicate that Griffiths could be insufficient if the course is already challenging. For a balanced approach, alternatives like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji are suggested as they may provide a suitable middle ground between the two extremes. Engaging with multiple resources can enhance understanding, making it beneficial to explore various texts on the subject.
hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Landau is more advanced than Griffiths. If you “require” Griffiths, the course might be too advanced. That being said, reading multiple discussions on a topic can be helpful.
 
hagopbul said:
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
Griffiths is too basic and Landau is too advanced. Why not go into something in-between like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Comparing Griffiths with Landau should be done tomorrow.
 

Thread 'Blennow to follow up Altland?'

TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum mechanics textbook?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Quantum mechanics book recommendations
Replies
10
Views
669
Need a book on Modern Physics to supplement Griffiths QM
Replies
17
Views
457
Classical What Lagrangian mechanics textbook should I use?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Textbook recommendations for second year physics (UK university)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Quantum Looking for upper division modern physics book
Replies
9
Views
2K
Quantum Is Landau's non-relativistic QM a good resource for self-studying?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Classical Supplement to Griffiths E&M/Prep for Graduate E&M
Replies
11
Views
4K
Quantum Quantum Textbook For Density Matrix, Pure & Mixed States, +more
Replies
2
Views
3K
Quantum Quantum mechanics textbook for 2nd year student
Replies
11
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top