Landau vs Griffith QM textbook

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of quantum mechanics textbooks by Landau and Griffiths, focusing on their respective levels of difficulty and suitability for a course. Participants explore whether supplementary reading of Griffiths is advisable alongside the use of Landau's books.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Landau is more advanced than Griffiths, suggesting that if Griffiths is required, the course may be too advanced.
  • Another participant mentions that reading multiple discussions on a topic can be beneficial, implying that different perspectives may enhance understanding.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that both Griffiths and Landau may not be suitable, proposing alternatives like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji as more appropriate options.
  • One participant indicates that a comparison of Griffiths and Landau will take place in the future, suggesting ongoing interest in the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the appropriateness of Griffiths and Landau for the course, indicating that there is no consensus on which textbook is preferable or if alternatives should be considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants imply that the suitability of the textbooks may depend on the specific course structure and the background of the students, which remains unspecified.

hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Landau is more advanced than Griffiths. If you “require” Griffiths, the course might be too advanced. That being said, reading multiple discussions on a topic can be helpful.
 
hagopbul said:
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
Griffiths is too basic and Landau is too advanced. Why not go into something in-between like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Comparing Griffiths with Landau should be done tomorrow.
 

Similar threads

Quantum mechanics textbook?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Quantum mechanics book recommendations
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Need a book on Modern Physics to supplement Griffiths QM
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Classical What Lagrangian mechanics textbook should I use?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Textbook recommendations for second year physics (UK university)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Quantum Looking for upper division modern physics book
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Quantum Is Landau's non-relativistic QM a good resource for self-studying?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classical Supplement to Griffiths E&M/Prep for Graduate E&M
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Quantum Quantum mechanics textbook for 2nd year student
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Quantum Quantum Textbook For Density Matrix, Pure & Mixed States, +more
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K