I'm reading about the derivation of the lande' g-factor which comes about when one considers an electron moving about a nucleus which is put in an external magnetic field. This gives rise to a perturbative hamiltonian(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] H = - (\vec \mu_s + \vec \mu_s) \cdot \vec B_{ext} = \frac{e}{2m} \vec{B}_{ext} \cdot (\vec J+ g \vec S)[/tex][/tex]

and to find the associated energy (expectation value of H) one encounters the problem that the spin S is not conserved in this situation but and one then states that the toatal spin J is conserved and that S will be precessing about J. Therefore the average value of S which is interessting for the expectation value can be expressed as

[tex] \vec S_{av} = \frac{(\vec S \cdot \vec J)}{J^2} \vec J[/tex]

and we can express

[tex]2 \vec S \cdot \vec J = J^2 + S^2 - L^2[/tex]

and the problem is essentially solved from there. Now what I wonder about is how one really figures out that the total angular momentum _is_ conserved. I would like a classical (and QM) proof of this statement. Could anyone lead me in the right direction?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lande g-factor and total angular momentum conservation

Loading...

Similar Threads for Lande factor total | Date |
---|---|

I In quantum statistics, inhibition/enhancement factors | Apr 2, 2018 |

I How to factorize the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian? | Dec 8, 2017 |

I Nuclear g-factor | Apr 4, 2017 |

B Does an electron's position collapse when measuring g factor? | Mar 19, 2017 |

Popper/Lande interpretation of QM | Aug 12, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**