Lande g-factor and total angular momentum conservation

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

I'm reading about the derivation of the lande' g-factor which comes about when one considers an electron moving about a nucleus which is put in an external magnetic field. This gives rise to a perturbative hamiltonian

[tex] H = - (\vec \mu_s + \vec \mu_s) \cdot \vec B_{ext} = \frac{e}{2m} \vec{B}_{ext} \cdot (\vec J+ g \vec S)[/tex][/tex]

and to find the associated energy (expectation value of H) one encounters the problem that the spin S is not conserved in this situation but and one then states that the toatal spin J is conserved and that S will be precessing about J. Therefore the average value of S which is interessting for the expectation value can be expressed as

[tex] \vec S_{av} = \frac{(\vec S \cdot \vec J)}{J^2} \vec J[/tex]

and we can express

[tex]2 \vec S \cdot \vec J = J^2 + S^2 - L^2[/tex]

and the problem is essentially solved from there. Now what I wonder about is how one really figures out that the total angular momentum _is_ conserved. I would like a classical (and QM) proof of this statement. Could anyone lead me in the right direction?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
194
"The effect can be classified as weak or strong according to whether the magnetic energy is small or large in comparison with the spin-orbit energy. The Zeeman Effect refers to the weak-field case, while Paschen-Back Effect refers to the strong-field case. In the weak-field case, the magnetic energy has matrix elements between states of different j for but not between states of the same j and different m. We neglect the former, because of the relatively large energy separation between states of different j. Thus the magnetic energy is diagonal with respect to m for each j and shifts the energy of each of the states by its expectation value for that state."
 

Related Threads on Lande g-factor and total angular momentum conservation

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
973
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
382
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
790
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Top