Laplace eq. in cylindrical coordinates and boundary conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates with specific boundary conditions. A solution exists in terms of a Fourier-Bessel series, but numerical methods are recommended for efficiency. The boundary condition on \Gamma_2 is addressed by transforming the function to satisfy Laplace's equation with appropriate conditions on \Gamma_1, \Gamma_3, and \Gamma_4. The use of Bessel functions of the second kind, specifically Y_0, along with J_0, is necessary due to the absence of r = 0 in the domain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and its applications
  • Familiarity with Fourier-Bessel series
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions, specifically J_0 and Y_0
  • Basic principles of Sturm-Liouville problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the numerical methods for solving partial differential equations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Bessel functions
  • Research Sturm-Liouville theory and its implications in boundary value problems
  • Explore the derivation and application of Fourier-Bessel series in cylindrical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on boundary value problems, particularly those involving cylindrical geometries and Laplace's equation.

giulianinimat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I have a 3D problems having a cylindrical symmetry. My domain is an hollow cylinder where i want to know if it is possible to find an analytical solution of the homogeneous Poisson equation, and if it is possible which is the potential in the whole domain. Due to the symmetry with respect to the angle, the domain is just a section of the cylinder and i have 4 different boundary conditions for the 4 segments of the boundary
Schermata 2021-02-08 alle 16.45.18.png
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @giulianinimat ,
:welcome: !​

Three questions :smile:
  1. Is this homework ?
  2. Did you read the guidelines ? (for homework we need you to post your own attempt at solution)
And finally:

3. What is your question ?​
 
The answet is "Yes", in the sense that a solution will exist in terms of a Fourier-Bessel series. However in practice solving the problem numerically is probably more efficient than trying to solve the Sturm-Liouville problem for the radial basis functions or calculating the coefficients.

The boundary condition on \Gamma_2 is not a self-adjoint condition, but you can solve that by taking \phi = \psi + \frac{K_2}{K_1} so that \psi satisfies Laplace's equation together with \psi = V_1 - \frac{K_2}{K_1} on \Gamma_1, \psi = V_2 - \frac{K_2}{K_1} on \Gamma_3, \partial \psi/\partial r = 0 on \Gamma_4 and \partial \psi /\partial r + K_1 \psi = 0 on \Gamma_2.

Since r = 0 is not in the domain, this is one of those rare instances where we will need to use the Bessel function of the second kind Y_0 as well as J_0, and the radial dependence must be \rho_n(r) = \cos \alpha_n J_0(k_nr) + \sin \alpha_nY_0(k_nr) where the eigenvalues k_n, n = 0, 1, \cdots, satisfy <br /> \left| \begin{array}{cc} k_nJ_0&#039;(k_nR_1) &amp; k_nY_0&#039;(k_nR_1) \\ k_nJ_0&#039;(k_nR_2) + K_1 J_0(k_nR_2) &amp; k_nY_0&#039;(k_nR_2) + K_1Y_0(k_nR_2)<br /> \end{array} \right| = 0 and <br /> \tan \alpha_n = -\frac{J_0&#039;(k_nR_1)}{Y_0&#039;(k_nR_1)}.<br /> The \rho_n are orthogonal with respect to the inner product
\langle f, g \rangle = \int_{R_1}^{R_2} f(r) g(r) r\,dr.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K