Laplace Transform ODE Solving: y'' + 2y' + y = 0 with Initial Conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The differential equation y'' + 2y' + y = 0 with initial conditions y(0)=1 and y(π)=0 can be solved using the Laplace Transform method. The transformation leads to the equation g'(s) = -1/(1+s²), where g(s) is the Laplace Transform of y(t). The Inverse Laplace Transform yields the solution y(t) = sin(t)/t, which satisfies the initial conditions. The general solution involving Bessel functions is also valid, but simplifies to y(t) = sin(t)/t under the given conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace Transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential equations and initial value problems
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions and their applications
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration and differentiation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Laplace Transforms in solving linear differential equations
  • Learn about Bessel functions and their significance in solving ODEs
  • Explore the Inverse Laplace Transform techniques for various functions
  • Practice solving initial value problems using both Laplace Transform and traditional methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students studying differential equations, particularly those interested in advanced techniques for solving ODEs using Laplace Transforms and Bessel functions.

IAmClifford
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Solve using laplace.

The diff eq is
y'' + 2*y' + *y = 0 subject to y(0)=1 and y(pi)=0

Sorry if notation isn't the norm. y'' and y' and y are time (t) based functions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you take the Laplace transform of everything? For example, I can differentiate the transform:

\frac{d}{ds}\left\{F(s)=L(f)=\int_0^{\infty}e^{-st}f(s)ds\right\}

and obtain:

\frac{dF}{ds}=-\int_0^{\infty}e^{-st}}[tf(t)]dt

so that

L\left\{tf(t)\right\}=-\frac{dF}{ds}

and there are other formulas for the other terms as well so that when you transform everything, you'll get another DE in terms of the transform F(s) which you then solve for F(s), then invert it.
 
The diff eq is
t*y'' + 2*y' + t*y = 0 subject to y(0)=1 and y(pi)=0
Is there no mistake in the wording of the problem ? Because solving this ODE with Laplace Transform is much more difficult than with traditional method.
Traditionally, the result is :
y(t) = (a*BesselJ[1/2 , t]+b*BesselJ[-1/2 , t] ) / Sqrt(t)
a, b = constants
With Laplace Transform method :
Notation : Laplace Transform of y(t) is g(s)
Laplace Transform of t*y(t) is -g'(s)
Laplace Transform of y'(t) is s*g(s)-y(0) = s*g(s)-1
Laplace Transform of y''(t) is s²g(s)-s*y(0)-y'(0) = s²g-s-y'(0)
Laplace Transform of t*y''(t) is -(s²g-s-y'(0) )' = -2s*g-s²g'(s)+1
Laplace Transform of t*y'' + 2*y' + t*y = 0 is :
-2s*g-s²g'(s)+1+2(s*g(s)-1)-g'(s) = 0
g'(s) = -1/(1+s²)
g(s) = -arctan(s) + Constant
So, we come across a snag : finding the Inverse Laplace Transform of arctan(s) ? Of coiurse, it should lead to the formula with the Bessel functions.
 
Last edited:
I bet you that the equation is t*y'' + 2*y' + t*y = 2 cos(t)
 
Its not, it's simply equal to 0.
OK. As a matter of fact, solving is simpler than it appears at first sight :
The key point : No need to integrate g'(s) = -1/(1+s²)
The Inverse Laplace Transform of g'(s) is -t*y(t)
The Inverse Laplace Transform of 1/(1+s²) is sin(t)
Then -t*y(t) = -sin(t)
The solution is y(t) = sin(t)/t
y(0) = limit sin(t)/t =1
y(pi) = sin(pi)/pi = 0
 
Note that the general solution expressed with the Bessel functions is correct :
y(t) = (a*BesselJ[1/2 , t]+b*BesselJ[-1/2 , t] ) / Sqrt(t)
But the Bessel functions of fractionnal order 1/2 and -1/2 are particular, since they reduces to simpler functions :
BesselJ[1/2 , t] = Sqrt(2/pi)*sin(t)/Sqrt(t)
BesselJ[-1/2 , t] = Sqrt(2/pi)*cos(t)/Sqrt(t)
Then, let A=a*Sqrt(2/pi) and B=b*Sqrt(2/pi) and we obtain :
y(t) = (A*sin(t)+B*cos(t) ) / t
Condition y(pi)=0 implies B=0
Condition y(0)=1 implies A=1 and B=0 leads to the result :
y(t) = sin(t)/t
which is consistent with the solution obtained with the Laplace Transform method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K