Laser question (Confinement factor and quantum well thickness)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the optical confinement factor (Gamma) in quantum-well lasers, specifically referencing the equation Gamma = 0.3 * N' * (d/d0) from the IEEE paper by Mohammad Reza Salehi. The variable d0 is defined as 1000 Å (angstroms), a standard measurement for the thickness of separate confinement heterostructures (SCH) surrounding quantum wells. The concept of carrier transparency is also clarified, indicating that at higher carrier numbers, stimulated absorption is outweighed by stimulated emission, leading to a transparent material state necessary for lasing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical confinement factors in lasers
  • Familiarity with quantum-well laser structures
  • Knowledge of stimulated emission and absorption processes
  • Basic grasp of semiconductor physics and materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Quantum-Well Laser Design" for insights on optimizing laser structures
  • Explore "Carrier Density and Transparency Current" to deepen understanding of lasing conditions
  • Investigate "Separate Confinement Heterostructures" for applications in laser technology
  • Study "Optical Confinement Factor Calculations" for practical applications in laser design
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, optical engineers, and students in photonics or semiconductor physics who are focused on laser technology and quantum-well laser design.

oronno
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. What do we mean by the carrier number at transparency. I mean, what is carrier transparency of a laser?

2. in an IEEE paper ("Circuit Modeling of Quantum-Well Lasers for Optoelectronic Integrated Circuits (ICs) Including Physical Effect of Deep-Level Traps" IEEE J. Quantum electronics, vol. 38, No. 11, November 2002 ) by Mohammad reza Salehi,

he introduced an equation,

Gamma = 0.3 * N' * (d/d0)

where Gamma is the optical Confinement Factor, N' is the number of quantum wells of the laser and d is the thickness of a single quantum well. He said, d0=1000A(angstrom). Now my question is, Where does this d0 come from and why did they mentioned that its value is 1000. I looked at the reference of this paper, they did the same. the didn't mention this either that what is d0.



thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oronno said:
1. What do we mean by the carrier number at transparency. I mean, what is carrier transparency of a laser?

If you consider a low number of carriers, lasing will not occur because the photons in the cavity will quickly be absorbed due to stimulated absorption and the photon number inside the cavity will be too low to cause efficient stimulated emission. However at higher carrier numbers the effect of stimulated absorption will be small compared to the effect of stimulated emission. The material becomes transparent. Usually the transparency current is defined as the current, where stimulated absorption and emission are exactly balanced.

oronno said:
2. in an IEEE paper ("Circuit Modeling of Quantum-Well Lasers for Optoelectronic Integrated Circuits (ICs) Including Physical Effect of Deep-Level Traps" IEEE J. Quantum electronics, vol. 38, No. 11, November 2002 ) by Mohammad reza Salehi,

he introduced an equation,

Gamma = 0.3 * N' * (d/d0)

where Gamma is the optical Confinement Factor, N' is the number of quantum wells of the laser and d is the thickness of a single quantum well. He said, d0=1000A(angstrom). Now my question is, Where does this d0 come from and why did they mentioned that its value is 1000. I looked at the reference of this paper, they did the same. the didn't mention this either that what is d0.

The optical confinement factor is usually defined as the ratio of the emission profile in the active medium to the complete emission profile in the structure. In QW lasers usually GaAs confinement layers are placed around the QWs (separate confinement heterostructures). 1000A is a very common value for the size of such a SCH, so I suppose this is where this value comes from.
 
Last edited:
Dear cthugha,

Thank you very very much for your reply. it really helped me a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K