Last Minute Question-Test Hours away

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsss
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric configuration of chromium (Cr) is 4s1 3d5, contrary to the common misconception of 4s2 3d4. This configuration arises because half-filling the d subshell lowers its energy, making it more stable. The 3d orbitals possess a higher energy than the 4s orbital, and while both notations (4s1 3d5 and 3d5 4s1) are acceptable, the latter is less conventional. The correct representation is crucial for maintaining clarity in electron configuration notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron configurations and orbital energy levels
  • Familiarity with the periodic table and transition metals
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics principles related to electron behavior
  • Basic chemistry concepts regarding subshell filling and stability
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electron configuration in transition metals
  • Study the concept of half-filled and fully filled subshell stability
  • Learn about the Aufbau principle and its exceptions
  • Explore the implications of electron configurations on chemical properties
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of electron configurations in transition metals.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
Last Minute Question--Test Hours away

So my book has the electric configuration of the period 4 transition elements say, for chromium, as, 3d5 4s2 because it says that once the d orbital has an electron, its energy is lowered. But i read everywhere else and my previous chem classes that the 3d orbitals have a higher energey that the 4s and that's why it is placed after after the 4s in the periodic table...can anyone clear this up for me?

Thanks a bunch!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Cr actually has the configuration 4s1 3d5 (instead of 4s2 3d4) because half-filling subshells reduces the energy.

The 3d orbitals definitely have a higher energy than 4s. Whether you choose to write 4s1 3d5 or 3d5 4s1 is just a matter of convention. Either is acceptable (but not 4s2 3d5 for Cr).
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say that.I've never seen anywhere 3d5 4s1,because the convention for writing down shells is pretty clear.It should indicate the correct order of energy increase of shells and subshells.What would happen if one wrote:
1s2 \ 2p6 \ 2s2 \ 3d10 \ 3s2 \ 3p6 ... total chaos,huh...?

Daniel.
 
Well, I believe Cr has an interesting explantion to it (what Gokul said seems sound), I'll have to check up on it.
 
dextercioby said:
I wouldn't say that.I've never seen anywhere 3d5 4s1,because the convention for writing down shells is pretty clear.It should indicate the correct order of energy increase of shells and subshells.What would happen if one wrote:
1s2 \ 2p6 \ 2s2 \ 3d10 \ 3s2 \ 3p6 ... total chaos,huh...?

Daniel.
I've seen both ways be used. I can't agree, in general, with the sense of writing it as 3d5 4s1 but I know that it does sometimes get written that way. And the possibility of changing order comes up only in the sub-shells succeeding those of the closest smaller noble gas. eg : Cr = [Ar] 3d5 4s1 . In this case, however, it makes sense to write it this way, since Cr^+ = [Ar] 3d5 4s0.
 
Last edited:
I've said what I've been taught in (high) school.Plain simple.And i gave the reasons for which i think that my version is correct.The rest is just interpretation which I'm not caring to consider.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
33K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
23K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K