LaTeX implementation ready for testing on Physics Forums

[chroot]

$$\overline{y} <br /> \hat{y}<br /> \check{y} <br /> \tilde{y} <br /> \acute{y} <br /> \grave{y} <br /> \dot{y} <br /> \ddot{y} <br /> \breve{y} <br /> \bar{y} <br /> \vec{y}<br /> \underline{y}$$

$$A\yleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \yrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

 

[chroot]

OMG, I'm a moron! newrepy.php should work now.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
$$\overline{y} <br /> \hat{y}<br /> \check{y} <br /> \tilde{y} <br /> \acute{y} <br /> \grave{y} <br /> \dot{y} <br /> \ddot{y} <br /> \breve{y} <br /> \bar{y} <br /> \vec{y}<br /> \underline{y}$$

$$A\yleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \yrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
Maybe overzealous on the search-and-replace on those x's, eh?

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

Okay.. new replies should work. The post preview and topic reviews now show a better message:

LaTeX image not viewable here.

This should mean the end of the dreaded "LaTeX image being generated." message.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

This is valid latex:

$$<br /> \eta_{\mu\nu}<br /> <br />$$

This is not:

$$\yourmom$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
This is valid latex:

$$<br /> \eta_{\mu\nu}<br /> <br />$$

This is not:

$$\yourmom$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

How about non-antialiased?

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

 

[chroot]

And now on the darker gray background...

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

 

[chroot]

Higher resolution... maybe scaling will make it appear nice.

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$ [/B][/QUOTE]

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Let's try scaling..

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

 

[chroot]

And now on the other background..

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

Ambitwistor, what do you think?

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Scaled even more aggressively...

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Experimenting with antialiasing..

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Experimenting with antialiasing.. some more.

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Experimentation is fun...

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Whoops :)

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Once more, white background..

$$A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C$$

- Warren

 

[chroot]

We have a weiner! I'm just antialiasing to a color halfway between the two background colors.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

$$L = \int_a^b \left( g_{\it ij} \dot u^i \dot u^j \right)^{1/2} dt$$

 

[Janus]

$$\displaystyle{\overline{\overline{A}B+A \overline{B}}\ =\ \overline{A\oplus B}}$$

 

[chroot]

$$\alpha \beta \cdots \psi \omega$$

 

[chroot]

$$\alpha \beta \gamma \cdots \chi \psi \omega$$

 

[chroot]

Okay folks...

All the caveats are fixed, I think. Topic review and reply preview now work properly.



- Warren

 

[chroot]

$$\Gamma^l_{\it k i} = \frac{1}{2} g^{\it l j} (\partial_k g_{\it i j} + \partial_i g_{\it j k} - \partial_j g_{\it k i)$$

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
How about the 'feynman' or 'feynmf' packages?

Diagrams are nice ...

$$\begin{picture}(80,80)(0,0)<br /> \put(0,0){\vector(4,3){30}}<br /> \put(28,21){\vector(0,1){30}}<br /> \end{picture}$$

$$\begin{picture}(160,160)(0,0)<br /> \qbezier(40,80)(80,120)(100,80)<br /> \end{picture}$$

Great idea -- drawing vector diagrams to illustrate force addition and so on would be very useful! I'll look into these packages.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

How's it looking, Ambi?

- Warren

 

[Janus]

$$\begin{array}{l | cr |} \ &\overline{A}&A\\\hline \overline{B}&0&1\\B&1&0\\\hline\end{array}$$

A Karnaugh map

 

[Janus]

$$\begin{array}{l | c|c|c|c |} \ &\overline{A}\,\overline{B}&A\,\overline{B}&\overline{A}\, B&A\, B\\\hline \overline{C}&0&1&0&0\\\hline C&1&0&1&1\\\hline\end{array}$$

 

[chroot]

Excellent stuff guys -- I'm going to include some of these in the "learn by example" thread in General Physics.

BTW, I have already introduced the software to the public -- I'm pretty sure all the kinks have been worked out. Please let me know if *anything* malfunctions!

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Ambi,

That's unfortunately because your browser is too stupid to check if the image has changed. I'm going to see if I can somehow force the images to not be cached, but I'm not sure it's possible. It's not the forum software causing the problem, it's your browser.

BTW, I'm using Mozilla Firebird, and it seems smart enough to always check the images.

- Warren