Legendre's associated function - number of zeros?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JP O'Donnell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of associated Legendre functions, specifically the number of sign changes within the interval -1 <= t <= 1. It is established that the associated Legendre function Pnm(t) changes sign n-m times, where Pnm(t) is defined as Pnm(t) = {1/(2nn!)}(1 - t²)m/2Dn+m(t² - 1)n. The confusion arises from the polynomial degree calculations, but it is clarified that the (1-t²)m/2 term does not affect the zeros of the function, confirming that the number of crossings is indeed n-m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of associated Legendre functions
  • Familiarity with polynomial degree calculations
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques in calculus
  • Basic concepts of trigonometric functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of associated Legendre functions in detail
  • Explore polynomial degree determination methods
  • Learn about the implications of sign changes in mathematical functions
  • Investigate applications of associated Legendre functions in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or mathematical physics, particularly those interested in the properties and applications of associated Legendre functions.

JP O'Donnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi.

It is stated that the associated Legendre functions change their sign n-m times in the interval -1 <= t <= 1, where t = cos(theta)...


Pnm(t) = {1/(2nn!)}(1 - t2)m/2Dn+m(t2 - 1)n ... Associated Legendre function


I can see how this number arises having differentiated (t2 - 1)n, n+m times. But this is then multiplied by a factor of (1 - t2)m/2, which is a polynomial in t of degree m.

So multiplying both polynomials you have a polynomial of degree [2n - (n+m)] + [m] = n

Where have I gone wrong in my understanding of this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found the reason why...

The (1-t2)m/2 term of the function has no effect on the zero's of the function as it will always be positive (|t| = |cos(theta)| =< 1)

Therefore the number of crossings will be n-m as stated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
979
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K