Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Let's Talk About Energy Sources

  1. Nov 14, 2011 #1
    I'm curious to know what you all think of the future of energy. What type of energy do you think has the most promise for the future? What role do you think the various engineering disciplines will play?

    I'm really looking forward to the future of this whole antimatter factor haha.
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2011 #2


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    OK Lets talk.
    What do you think will be the role of, picking one, oil, as an energy source in the future?
  4. Nov 14, 2011 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Antimatter factory? No such thing exists nor are there any plans for one. The thing is with antimatter is that it takes more energy to produce it than it gives (though it would be an almost perfect medium for energy storage).

    Considering the problems of future peak oil I would expect to see a necessary change in cultural attitudes reducing energy consumption alongside; increases in gas and coal usage, investment in renewables and construction of more nuclear reactors.
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2011
  5. Nov 14, 2011 #4


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    By far the biggest piece of our energy future will have to be nuclear power.
  6. Nov 14, 2011 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    This is a reason why I am extremely jealous of the French, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France" [Broken] mean that when we actually need to invest in fossil fuel alternatives it will take years to even get started.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  7. Nov 17, 2011 #6
    Has to be nuclear, we need to get over the mistrust of it as a fuel source.
  8. Nov 18, 2011 #7
    The only real player, at this stage is nuclear. The Germans seem to have a neat trick that may change a lot though. I read that they are working on scalable technology to use excess power to generate natural gas from Water(hydrogen) and CO2.
    Man made Natural gas, may be the missing storage piece that could push alternate energy devices over the hump. The real problem with most of the alternative energy methods, is their inconsistency. The wind does not always blow, and the sun does not always shine. Separating the energy capture from the energy demand with a storage medium. The infrastructure is already in place to distribute natural gas, and we can already convert transport to run on it. One additional thing, If I can make methane, making more complex hydrocarbons may not be out of the question.
  9. Nov 18, 2011 #8
    Also, a way of producing hydrogen cheaply and efficently to run our cars on. Anybody heard of any exciting new prospects in this field?
  10. Nov 18, 2011 #9
    I want to know more about why people have such a negative view of nuclear power, I mean obviously because of nuclear accidents and the problem of spent fuel storage, but I am a firm believer that we can solve any problem thrown at us. I believe that we can reduce the chance of having a nuclear accident to make it so insignificant that it would be crazy not to have nuclear power as, at least, a reliable supplement to other forms of energy production. I have read of so many innovations in nuclear power production, e.g. thorium fueled reactors, better reactor design. But everyone is afraid of it. What say others?
  11. Nov 18, 2011 #10
    Use of solar power to produce hydrogen..

    The tech is already in place (in canada), but is xpensive..

    But i stroingly believe it'll take over in near future..
  12. Nov 18, 2011 #11
    I suppose this spins out of the notion that there are other alternatives (wind, solar, & hydro) that don't have the environmental issues offsetting them. People who haven't studied these things assume that they can be used in the same way gas, coal, and uranium is; to make electricity. Unfortunately, they just aren't competititve. Wind works really well in some areas, but that's rare.
  13. Nov 18, 2011 #12
    Why not just convert strictly to electricity? Why use the H2 as an energy carrier? If you mean for mobile/auto than why not batteries?
  14. Nov 29, 2011 #13
    Electricity needs to be used less than a second after it is created, otherwise it just goes to waste.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook