Life without Government: Could Civilisation Survive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Government Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of living without a central government, particularly in the context of a catastrophic event that eliminates governmental structures. Participants consider the implications for social order, law, and leadership in such a scenario, examining both theoretical and practical aspects of governance and anarchy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a civilized society can exist without a central government, suggesting that a power vacuum could lead to chaos.
  • Others propose that laws could be maintained without a government, although they express uncertainty about how this would be achieved.
  • One participant cites Belgium as an example of a society functioning well, potentially without a strong central government.
  • Concerns are raised that non-violent individuals may be dominated by violent ones in the absence of governmental authority.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of leadership, with some arguing that some form of leadership is necessary to prevent chaos and ensure fair distribution of resources.
  • Participants mention that anarchy might only work in small communities and express skepticism about its viability compared to democracy.
  • Some argue that any form of governance, even if not labeled as such, is necessary to settle disputes and maintain stability.
  • There are references to historical forms of governance, such as that of the Iroquois, as examples of alternative systems that could inspire modern governance.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of government in preventing crime, suggesting that accountability may act as a deterrent for some individuals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on whether a society can function without a central government. Some believe that some form of governance is essential, while others explore the potential for anarchy or alternative systems of leadership.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of government and anarchy, as well as the conditions under which societies might function without central authority. The discussion includes various perspectives on the role of leadership and the nature of social order.

  • #31
Moridin said:
The fact that murder rates in the states is pretty high despite the death penalty contradicts your assertions.
That makes absolutely no sense, Moridin. I made no assertions about murder rates. I merely pointed out logical flaws in your argument.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ivan Seeking said:
I think this goes back to the idea that locks are designed to keep an honest man honest.

A crook is a crook regardless of deterrents.

This is so true and under examined.
 
  • #33
Government is a kind of slow motion pillage with reduced levels of rape. I expect that without it, these things would run more efficiently.
 
  • #34
jimmysnyder said:
Government is a kind of slow motion pillage with reduced levels of rape. I expect that without it, these things would run more efficiently.

There are places on Earth with little or no government. Somalia comes to mind. No where I'd like to be, thanks anyway.
 
  • #35
lisab said:
There are places on Earth with little or no government. Somalia comes to mind. No where I'd like to be, thanks anyway.

The reason Somalia is the way it is, is a direct result of government.
 
  • #36
Moridin said:
The reason Somalia is the way it is, is a direct result of government.

Direct result of colonisation as well. But that's a positive and negative issue.
 
  • #37
lisab said:
There are places on Earth with little or no government. Somalia comes to mind. No where I'd like to be, thanks anyway.

There aint much in Knightcote, though i think they may re introduce our old toll gate to pay for the half dozen buckets of tar they used fixing our road.
 
  • #38
Moridin said:
The reason Somalia is the way it is, is a direct result of government.

And when the government was dissolved, did life improve for its citizens? Did Somalia, freed from the unbearable yoke of government, suddenly become some sort of nirvana? No, it did not.

I'm no fan of stupid government, but this notion that all that is wrong with your lives stems from government is sophomoric.

In my work I have a lot of contact with Canadians and Canadian regulators, and I find their point of view towards government quite different from what I hear here in the US. They strive for good governance. Imagine that!
 
  • #39
Schrödinger's Dog said:
Direct result of colonisation as well. But that's a positive and negative issue.

You don't know about the depredations that Islamic slavery made in Eastern Africa, do you?
Villages and valleys were ruined and depopulated in order to fill the slave markets of the Maghrib, Turkey and Arabia.

Only when Western powers intervened militarily from the 1880's onwards (rather than ineffectual diplomatic pressures) were it possible to eradicate this evil.
 
  • #40
arildno said:
You don't know about the depredations that Islamic slavery made in Eastern Africa, do you?
Villages and valleys were ruined and depopulated in order to fill the slave markets of the Maghrib, Turkey and Arabia.

Only when Western powers intervened militarily from the 1880's onwards (rather than ineffectual diplomatic pressures) were it possible to eradicate this evil.

I'm not arguing in favour of any colonisation, I'm sorry if it appeared that way. God if there's one thing that can be learned from history it's that invading other countries is seldom worth the effort and the loss of life, if we consider it holistically. And in the 20th/21st it's slowly becoming obsolete despite ourselves.
 
  • #41
Ivan Seeking said:
I think this goes back to the idea that locks are designed to keep an honest man honest.
Agreed and in two ways: first to dissuade the citizen from straying and preying on others, and second to prevent the citizen from seeking revenge when preyed upon because society has agreed on punishment and will at least attempt to execute the punishment.

But this is feebly trying to reinvent Hobbes, Hume and Locke, back to them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobbes#Leviathan"
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3207

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Treatise_of_Human_Nature"

http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Treatises_of_Government#Second_Treatise"
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7370
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #42
wolram said:
Could there be a civilised way to live without central government? suppose some catastrophe wiped out your countries government, would there be a priority to replace
it?


I have almost no faith in human nature, so I think most people need leaders because they would be lost without them. To me, a country without a strong ,central government would be anarchy.

Did you mean all the law enforcement-such as the police-be destroyed?
 
  • #43
There is much more to "government" than is being discussed here... what about development and maintenance of infrastructure?
 
  • #44
pantaz said:
There is much more to "government" than is being discussed here... what about development and maintenance of infrastructure?

I'm all about infrastructure, pantaz! Infrastructure is destiny!
 
  • #45
pantaz said:
There is much more to "government" than is being discussed here... what about development and maintenance of infrastructure?

Sure enough; but the point concerning that a society needs to have a mechanism by which criminality is held in check is SUFFICIENT reason to to regard "life without government" as un-enviable.

That there also are, or might be, OTHER reasons supportive of that conclusion is, of course, not denied.
 
  • #46
Statism has been the source of the most appalling genocides in all of history. Stalin, Mao, Hitler are some examples of what statism has given us.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K